What is it about?
European democracies differ in the number of government coalition partners and in the preferences of political parties that compose the government. We study the question how different governments translate public opinion into public policy. To do that, we track more than 300 proposals for new policies for four years in three countries: Germany, Denmark and the UK. We find that public opinion for a new policy significantly increases the chance that the policy will be adopted. But single-party governments are no better or worse in responding to public opinion than coalition governments. And when the government strongly supports the policy change, public opinion does no matter much. Yet, when the government does not support the policy change, having strong public support for the policy change makes a difference, increasing the chance that the new policy will be adopted.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Responsiveness of public policy (what the government does) to public opinion (what the people want) is essential for democracies. It is important to know that single-party government as well as coalitions with multiple parties can be just as good in translating public opinion into new policies. It is also reassuring to know that when the public strongly favors a policy, a government cannot completely ignore it, even when the change goes against the preferences of the government parties themselves.
Perspectives
The question that this article addresses is rather fundamental for understanding democratic governance. But it has been difficult to address due to lack of empirical data. The major challenge of this project has been in identifying and integrating relevant data sources on public opinion, party preferences, government types, media salience, and public policy change.
Dimiter Toshkov
Universiteit Leiden
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Party government and policy responsiveness. Evidence from three parliamentary democracies, Journal of Public Policy, November 2018, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s0143814x18000417.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







