Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: OP-088: DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF 16-SLICE VERSUS DUAL SOURCE 64-SLICE MDCT ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY, International Journal of Cardiology, March 2011, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(11)70174-7.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
