Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Comparison of immune responses and protective efficacy of intranasal prime-boost immunization regimens using adenovirus-based and CpG/HH2 adjuvanted-subunit vaccines against genital Chlamydia muridarum infection, Vaccine, January 2012, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.086.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
