What is it about?

Workplace procrastination is evident. However, literature lacks a validated scale to address work-context specific dynamics of workplace procrastination. This study develops and validates the Procrastination at Work Scale (PAWS) and compares its psychometric characteristics across the Dutch and Turkish office employees.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This study is among the first to provide a generic scale to measure contemporary workplace procrastination. The PAWS shows a two-factor structure across two distinguished samples. Results show that procrastination behavior can be assessed by the PAWS and procrastination at work appear to be problematic behavior based on its relationship with boredom and counterproductive work behaviors. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the paper.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects, Personality and Individual Differences, October 2016, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page