What is it about?

Project management organizes about 30% of the world’s economy. Many recent projects apply critical chain project management (CCPM) methodology, which requires the design of project and feeding buffers. Accurate sizing of these buffers is essential, because too small buffers result in emergency procedures to prevent late delivery, whereas too large buffers result in uncompetitive bids and lost contracts. Previous buffer sizing research, focused predominantly on the critical chain, typically results in excessive buffers, and in critical chains being challenged by feeding buffers during planning. This work also performs in- consistently, for example in makespan estimation, at execution. We propose a new procedure for buffer sizing based on network decomposition, which offers logical advantages over previous ones. First, the size of a feeding buffer is determined from all associated noncritical chains. Second, the project buffer incor- porates safety margins outside the critical chain by comparing feeding chains with their parallel critical counterparts. Computational testing on a case study of a real project and extensive simulated data shows that our procedure delivers much greater accuracy in estimating project makespan, and smaller feeding buffers. Furthermore, the resulting critical chain is never challenged. Additional benefits include delayed expenditure, and reductions in work-in-process, rework, and multitasking.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Buffer Sizing in Critical Chain Project Management by Network Decomposition, Omega, December 2020, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102382.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page