“Hearing voices” in schizophrenia: Who’s voices are they?

  • Anatoly Kreinin
  • Medical Hypotheses, April 2013, Elsevier
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.12.022

‘‘Hearing voices’’ in schizophrenia: Who’s voices are they?

What is it about?

Auditory hallucinations represent a particularly rich and varied phenomenology. They involve the perception of a large array of sounds, which, when involving voices, are referred to as auditory verbal hallucinations. I propose that auditory hallucinations are in fact on a continuum beginning with acousma (Greek ?jotr- la-audible)-separate sounds: noise, ringing, shouts, shots, music, raps, and phonemes (the smallest contrastive unit in the sound system of a language) and ending with words, sentences, which are the audible expressions of thought disorders (such as over- valued ideas), e.g. the ability to control one’s thought processes.

Why is it important?

Hearing voices is not a disturbance of perception but rather of thought – or ‘‘pseudo-perception’’. The manner in which patients report hearing voices allows confirmation of the degree of cooperation (or dissimulation). For example, reporting on the voice of an unfamiliar woman by a male patient can indicate dissimulation.In terms of research, it can be assumed that owing to the relationship of the phenomenon of hearing voices to thought, it is difficult to expect that with the currently available tools (such as fMRI, PET, SPECT) it will be possible to identify the brain areas definitively involved in the creation of the voices. Voices and thinking are in the same brain area. Thought is more damaged because of the lack of functioning of the brain areas and structures responsible for supervising thinking processes. The differences that can be found using fMRI, PET SPECT will be minimal if at all, because the brain areas are the same – thus new methods must be sought for identifying the difference in brain function between those that supervise thinking and those lacking capacity to supervise thinking and therefore create hallucinations. (the greater the impairment the less the capacity to differentiate thought from speech).

Perspectives

Professor Anatoly Kreinin
Technion Israel Institute of Technology

In light of the above, we believe that we must continue to search for tools with higher resolution to identify defective brain activity in those areas or to establish a method that will clearly identify the processes responsible for thought control and regulation and to separate between normative and patho- logical processes in these regions. We believe that patients with strong hallucinations have greater impairment in comparison to patients with delusions (they still have a thought process). The disease process in patients with predominant hallucinations in their clinical pic- ture is more destructive and begins earlier than among patients with predominant delusions.

Read Publication

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2012.12.022

The following have contributed to this page: Professor Anatoly Kreinin