What is it about?

In modern Castilian Spanish, clitic pronouns are positioned in front of the finite verb and may therefore end up in sentence-initial position. In old Spanish main clauses, clitics are often placed after the finite verb, and rarely occur sentence-initially. This placement pattern is linked to the so-called Tobler-Mussafia Law. A popular motivation for this placement pattern is a prosodic rule which bans unstressed words from the sentence-initial position. If this is true, old Spanish should tolerate less unstressed material at the beginning of the sentence than modern Spanish does. As the empirical comparison reveals the opposite, a prosodic motivation for the Tobler-Mussafia Law seems highly implausible.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The explanation and motivation of the Tobler-Mussafia Law is a long-disputed topic not only in Romance linguistics. There are a number of alternative non-prosodic accounts for the respective clitic placement patterns, but prosodic motivations are still popular. As far as I know, this is the first study that compares the prosodic patterns of related +TM and -TM varieties directly in order to test whether the prosodic motivation is empirically plausible.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Prosody and object clitic placement: A comparison of Old and Modern Spanish, Lingua, October 2016, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.002.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page