Addendum to “Using neural networks for 13C NMR chemical shift prediction—comparison with traditional methods” [J. Magn. Reson. 157 (2002) 242–252]

Jens Meiler, Brent Lefebvre, Antony Williams, Michel Hachey
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance, November 2004, Elsevier
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.07.012

An addendum showing how an error crept into an article about NMR prediction

What is it about?

This addendum concerns the fact that a minor error in the structure input to an NMR prediction algorithm led to a fairly significant error in a paper comparing the performance of various NMR prediction algorithms

Why is it important?

The important issue here is that errors can certainly creep into papers as a result of so many subtle variables. The addendum took two years to issue after the paper but today this would not take long to address at all using modern social sharing approaches.

Read Publication

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2004.07.012

The following have contributed to this page: Dr Antony John Williams