What is it about?

It is often claimed that excess of leverage can lead to bubbles due to asset substitution. We show that asset substitution alone cannot cause bubbles because it is priced into the intermediaries׳ securities. But incomplete contracts and managerial agency problems can make intermediaries take excessive risk to exploit limited liability, bidding up risky asset prices.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

First, our model predicts what kinds of assets will be prone to bubbles. Second, our model provides a potential explanation for why riskier assets can have too low risk premiums relative to their risk. Third, our theory also offers interpretations of the causes and consequences of financial crises.

Perspectives

Our results extend the intuition of Modigliani and Miller's (1958) Theorem by showing that leverage is irrelevant to equity value in the absence of bubbles, but lowers equity value in the presence of bubbles.

Jungsuk Han
Handelshogskolan i Stockholm

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Contractual incompleteness, limited liability and asset price bubbles, Journal of Financial Economics, May 2015, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.002.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page