What is it about?
The subtle influence of power distance on cockpit learning and its implications on aviation safety remained undetected and have not been explored much. This study takes into account the negative influence of power distance (PD) on cockpit learning (CL) in the airline industry and considers that the negative relationship may be reduced by the moderating role of pilot's interdependence and inclination towards teamwork in the cockpit.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The menace of power distance in the cockpit and its repercussions must be understood by pilots as well as management. Efforts should be made to trim down the power gradient through focused CRM programs. Any interventions aimed at enhancing pilot's learning and flight safety must possess a cardinal supplement of pilot's interdependence and inclination towards teamwork.
Perspectives
Prior aviation studies discovered that poor communication due to cultural factors has been a common cause of pilot errors in making decisions. There are two main reasons for it: Cultural reason which is measured by power distance, and ranking reason driven by job subordination. A pilot in the cockpit must be good as both an equal colleague (subordinate) in a team context and an assertive captain of the aircraft. This dichotomous role of a pilot establishes a fine balance to be maintained constantly for positive communication and effective learning.
Dr Muhammad Aftab Alam
Macquarie University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Cockpit learning in power distant cockpits: The interaction effect of pilot's interdependence and inclination to teamwork in airline industry, Journal of Air Transport Management, January 2015, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.10.003.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
