What is it about?

The Uncovered Interest Parity theory, predicated on perfect capital mobility and a floating exchange rate regime, faces challenges in real-world contexts marked by capital restrictions and diverse exchange rate regimes. This research investigates the validity of the UIP hypothesis in selected OECD countries, considering the role of capital control and de facto exchange rate regimes.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The UIP hypothesis moves beyond being a theoretical fallacy and emerges as empirically verifiable, holding significant implications for policymakers and advancing the understanding of international finance.

Perspectives

This study explores the role of capital control and de facto exchange rate regimes in the UIP relationship. The findings offer compelling evidence in support of the UIP, particularly for immediate and short-term interest rates.

Dr Nusrate Aziz
Algoma University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Why does uncovered interest parity fail empirically?, International Review of Financial Analysis, October 2024, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103429.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page