What is it about?

We show the high labor demand in the public sector after natural disasters lead to its shortage in the private sector using individual job postings after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Considering the mechanism of the “labor market channel of fiscal policy,” this implies stricken areas may suffer secular stagnation.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Encountering the tragedy of natural disasters, we tend to focus on reconstruction of infrastructure and housing, or job creation to stabilize victims’ livelihood. However, one policy tool is not enough to attain these two goals. In the Great East Japan Earthquake, the Government of Japan created many jobs through the reconstruction of infrastructure. However, as shown here, this policy crowded out employment in the private sector. To avoid this side effect, we should consider additional policies to increase labor market participation. It would be even better if this labor inflow to the private sector would renew human capital, provoking Schumpeterian creative destruction. Also, to enable firms to keep their original optimal capital-to-labor ratio, some subsidies for private investment should be prepared

Perspectives

Although this study focuses on labor markets after a disaster, its implications are useful for multiple facets of economics. We briefly summarize this point here. First, for disaster economics, our results can contribute to the discussion of long-run economic growth such as the creative destruction hypothesis. As noted, the direction of long-run growth after a disaster is still controversial, especially for geologic disasters. Moreover, it seems that there is no theoretical proposal on the background mechanism without the Schumpeterian one, and no analysis on indirect effects of reconstruction policy. In contrast, our analysis shows the possibility that reconstruction policy plays an important role for growth through the labor market channel of fiscal policy in Alesina et al. [1]. Future study should estimate whether private investment is decreased by the resulting reduction of employment in non-construction sectors after reconstruction. Second, our study can be regarded as confirmation of the existence of the labor market channel of fiscal policy in Alesina et al. [1] since most reconstruction consists of public works. Because our study employs daily microdata, our identification is more concrete than in Alesina et al. [1]; which employs annual multi-county data. We should realize the possibility that reconstruction projects for natural disasters may result in a reduction in private investment and thereby long-term stagnation. Third, for labor economics, this study has two contributions. The first is to confirm the crowding-out effects of private employment by fiscal expansion. It is quite rare to find this effect empirically. One case we know of is Algan et al. [33]; which finds the effects of public employment using OECD panel data over 40 years. The present study contributes to this existing literature on the crowding-out effects using microdata of job postings. The second contribution is to provide the first analysis of vacancy duration in Japan using a duration modeling method. Although the analysis on vacancy duration has been done in some countries, it is far from satisfactory. Our estimation results for covariates would be useful for understanding employer’s hiring behavior.

Dr. Keigo Kameda

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Effects of reconstruction works on private employment after a natural disaster: A case in the stricken area of the Great East Japan Earthquake, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, January 2021, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101968.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page