What is it about?

This study assesses a range of clustered micro-generators using an ‘integrated approach’ that combines energy analysis, environmental life-cycle assessment, and an indicative financial appraisal. Eight clusters of micro-generators were designated to meet the heat and electricity requirements of five different dwelling types, each one specified to two different UK performance standards (2006 building regulations and a zero-carbon specification). For these 80 scenarios, various combinations of heat pumps with solar hot water and/or PV systems yield the most attractive performance metrics with all of the clusters having energy and carbon paybacks (4.5-5.5 and 5.0-7.0 years respectively) within their operational lifetimes, and would hence create net savings overall. But the clusters were generally found to have unattractive financial payback periods (50-80 years), although this result will be sensitive to the discount rate and prevailing energy prices and support mechanisms. The focus is on the use of clustered micro-generators in the context of UK transition pathways to a low-carbon economy out to 2050, but the lessons learned are applicable to many industrialised countries.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Building ‘zero carbon’ homes will be essential to achieving the carbon reductions within industrialised countries in order to meet their commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. Such high performance buildings may require a combination or ‘cluster’ of micro-generators to be installed, such as a heat pump to provide heating and a solar photovoltaic (PV) array to produce electricity. When sized and installed appropriately, these technologies have lower emissions than the conventional systems they displace (centralised grid electricity and gas-fired boilers). However, if the ‘embodied’ energy and carbon is not recouped from that saved during the lifetime of the micro-generator, then there is no net saving overall.

Perspectives

In 2007 the UK Government announced its intention to require all new homes to be ‘Zero Carbon Homes’ from 2016, which would necessitate an improvement in the energy efficiency of the building fabric, together with low-carbon micro-generation technologies installed in the building. This national policy was abandoned in 2015, amongst some controversy, but the Mayor of London has nevertheless implemented a city-wide zero-carbon homes policy. In addition, given the difficulty of decarbonising some sectors of the economy, it is likely zero-carbon buildings will ultimately be needed to meet the UK’s Climate Change Act 2008 (revised in 2019 to a net-zero emissions target) and commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement. In order to achieve zero-carbon homes, it is envisaged that micro-generation will be required to offset the carbon emissions associated with energy use in the home. However, to produce a micro-generator, energy is required and carbon is emitted ‘upstream’ of the building itself. This energy and carbon associated with the production and installation of a micro-generator is known as the ‘embodied energy’ and ‘embodied carbon’ respectively. Such data is determined using methods like energy analysis and environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA). If the embodied energy and carbon is not recouped from energy and carbon saved throughout the lifetime of the micro-generator, there is no net benefit in terms of saving energy and carbon. The time that is required for the cumulative amount of energy saved to equal the amount of embodied energy is known as the Energy Payback Period (EPP). Similarly, the Carbon Payback Period (CPP) is the time taken for carbon savings to offset the amount of embodied carbon in construction. Much research has recently been undertaken on the net energy and carbon performance of individual micro-generators {e.g. micro-wind turbines, solar hot water [SHW] systems, and solar photovoltaic [PV] cell arrays}. But clusters of micro-generators may be required to achieve zero-carbon homes: perhaps, for example, an air source heat pump (ASHP) to provide heating and a solar PV panel to deliver electricity. Indeed, the performance of heat generating technologies (e.g., ASHP, ground source heat pumps (GSHP), micro-combined heat and power [mCHP] plants, or SHW systems) is strongly related to demand as well as the interaction with other such heat generating technologies. Consequently, rather than evaluating individual devices, it is important to analyse the operation of the whole cluster.

Professor Emeritus Geoffrey P Hammond
University of Bath

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Indicative appraisal of clustered micro-generators for a low-carbon transition in the UK building sector, Global Transitions, January 2020, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.001.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page