What is it about?
Landholders are expected to take action on issues which cross property boundaries. Training on these issues can be situated within modernist or relational frameworks. Learning styles relating to human/nature relations and NRM/DRR issues are malleable. Training has the potential to guide ways of knowing human/nature relations. This has implications for the outcomes of NRM/DRR programs.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The paper shows why it is important that practitioners and their funders recognise the implications and potential outcomes of the different ontological foundations of programs working with landholders in the areas of natural resource management (NRM) and disaster risk reduction (DRR).
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Divergent approaches to resolving pressures on NRM and DRR programs: A case study of sustainable fire management training, Geoforum, October 2015, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.08.001.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
