What is it about?
The aim of this study was to estimate the age of subjects from their dental age by showing the different stages of tooth development using the Nolla method in a Spanish population sample considering the gender, age group, and the development of the two dental arches. The sample consisted of 604 orthopantomographs corresponding to Spanish children (male: 302 and female: 302) aged from 4 to 14 years old. The resulting chronological and dental ages were compared using Student’s t-test. We obtained a good index of agreement between the evaluators and good internal consistency in the evaluation of the ages of the teeth. In general, the dental age estimates were lower than the chronological ages, obtaining an underestimation with the application of the Nolla method. In the male group, the average dental age of the maxillary teeth was 8.36 years and that of the mandibular teeth was 8.40 years, compared to the chronological age of 8.84 years in both cases. In the female group, the average dental age of the maxillary teeth was 7.76 years and that of the mandibular teeth was 7.88 years, compared to the chronological age of 8.70 years in both cases. On applying the Nolla method to our sample, a significant overestimation was observed only in children aged between 4 and 6.9 years. The Nolla method can be used as a complementary tool for estimating age in children of Spanish origin. The application of this method is more favourable in the case of individuals evaluated under the law applied to minors. In general, with this method, age is underestimated, but the calculations involved are reliable, and greater precision has been observed in male than in female. The data from this study can be used as a reference to determine the dental maturity of Spanish children and to estimate their ages.
Featured Image
Photo by Kamal Hoseinianzade on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The importance of this study lies in its aim to estimate dental age in children using the Nolla method, which evaluates tooth development stages. By analyzing a sample of 604 orthopantomographs from Spanish children aged 4 to 14, the research provides insights into the accuracy of this method in estimating dental maturity based on gender and age group. The findings indicate a good agreement between evaluators and highlight that dental age estimates were generally lower than chronological ages, suggesting an underestimation when applying the Nolla method. This research is significant because it offers a reliable tool for assessing dental maturity, which is crucial for various clinical applications, including orthodontic treatment planning and legal assessments involving minors. The study also emphasizes that the Nolla method can be particularly useful for evaluating children under legal considerations, providing a reliable means to estimate their ages. Overall, the data can serve as a reference for understanding dental maturity in Spanish children and can guide practitioners in making informed decisions regarding their dental care.
Perspectives
I believe this research is significant for several reasons. It offers a thorough assessment of the Nolla method's effectiveness in estimating dental age, which is crucial for orthodontic treatment and forensic evaluations. Our findings show that while the Nolla method generally underestimates dental age, it remains a reliable tool for assessing dental maturity in Spanish children. This study contributes valuable insights that can help practitioners make informed decisions regarding pediatric dental care. Ultimately, it emphasizes the importance of evidence-based approaches in estimating dental age and highlights the Nolla method's potential as a complementary tool in clinical practice.
Prof. Rosa Mourelle
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Evaluation of the accuracy of the Nolla method for the estimation of dental age of children between 4–14 years old in Spain: A radiographic study, Forensic Science International, August 2019, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.057.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







