What is it about?

This article explores pulse diagnosis, a traditional Chinese medicine practice in which practitioners assess a patient's health by feeling their pulse at the wrist. A challenge with this method is that it is often subjective—different practitioners may interpret the same pulse differently. To address this issue, the authors develop classification metrics—essentially, measurable standards or guidelines—to help improve the consistency and objectivity of pulse diagnosis. They apply data and statistical methods to more clearly define pulse types, aiming to bridge traditional practices with modern science.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Improve reliability: Helps ensure that different practitioners using the same pulse diagnosis data reach similar conclusions. Support integration: Makes it easier to integrate Traditional Chinese Medicine into modern healthcare systems. Enhance training: Provides clearer guidance for teaching pulse diagnosis to new practitioners. Promote research: Opens the door to more scientific research on traditional diagnostic methods.

Perspectives

Medical Practice: Combining ancient wisdom with modern tools is expected to lead to more accurate diagnosis and treatment. Technological Development: It may inspire the invention of devices that can automatically measure and classify pulses. Global Recognition: It will help Traditional Chinese Medicine gain greater recognition and acceptance worldwide. Future Research: Further research is encouraged to refine and validate the application of these indicators in different populations and disease conditions.

Professor Jian-Jun SHU
Nanyang Technological University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Developing classification indices for Chinese pulse diagnosis, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, September 2007, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.06.004.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page