What is it about?
The article begins with a brief history of the use of non-face-to-face interventions as well as the earliest recorded use of “tele-health” before discussing the modern benefits and risks associated with usage. Considerations for the psychologist, as well as the client are detailed; incorporating ethical implications. The authors conclude that the utilization of tele-health interventions is an exponentially expanding field that should continue to be explored. Despite many well-conceived studies, a psychologist should educate themselves in all aspects of the new modes of intervention (e.g., ethical, legal, evidence-based treatments) before attempting to implement them into everyday practice. The article ends with a discussion on the acceptance among therapists, as well as the outlook for the future.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
One of the most controversial topics in the field of clinical psychology, online tele-health, or the integration of computers and the internet with therapeutic techniques, remains at the forefront of many debates. Despite potential interest, there are numerous factors that a psychologist must consider before integrating an online tele-health intervention into their own practice. This article outlines literature pertinent to the debate.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Controversy clarified: An updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health, Clinical Psychology Review, December 2011, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.08.003.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







