Supplemental blocks in single versus triple injections in infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks

What is it about?

Background and objectives To evaluate the single‐injection and triple‐injection techniques in infraclavicular blocks with an ultrasound‐guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. Methods This study comprised 139 patients who were scheduled for elective or emergency upper‐limb surgery. Patients who received an infraclavicular blocks with a triple‐injection technique were included in Group T (n = 68). Patients who received an infraclavicular blocks with a single‐injection technique were included in Group S (n = 71). The number of patients who required supplementary blocks or had complete failure, the recovery time of sensory blocks and early and late complications were noted. Results The block success rate was 84.5% in Group S, and 94.1% in Group T without any need for supplementary nerve blocks. The blocks were supplemented with distal peripheral nerve blocks in 8 patients in Group S and in 3 patients in Group T. Following supplementation, the block success rate was 95.8% in Group S and 98.5% in Group T. These results were not statistically significant. A septum preventing the proper distribution of local anesthetic was clearly visualized in 4 patients. The discomfort rate during the block was significantly higher in Group T (p < 0.05). Conclusion In ultrasound‐guided medial‐approach infraclavicular blocks, single‐injection and triple‐injection techniques did not differ in terms of block success rates. The need for supplementary blocks was higher in single injections than with triple injections. The presence of a fascial layer could be the reason for improper distribution of local anesthetics around the cords.

Featured Image