What is it about?
This study investigates the influence of the river flow regime type on the e-flows releases and hydropower production, constrained by eight hydrologically-based e-flows methods. For this purpose, 20 run-of-river hydropower plants up to 10 MW, from five Iberian Peninsula basins, located in regions with pluvial highly fluctuating, pluvial stable, pluvial winter, and pluvio-nival flow regimes were analysed. We integrated a hydropower model with a hydrological model, and eight e-flows methods to estimate mean daily hydropower production, e-flows, and hydrologic alteration. The results demonstrate little influence on hydropower production and e-flows releases for the pluvial regime type, notably, pluvial stable regime river reaches. Pluvio-nival regime provides unstable hydropower production and comparatively high e-flows alteration. Overall, hydrologic parameters represented by five global indices derived from Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration were affected differently for the e-flows releases regime induced by tested e-flows methods. In general, e-flows methods that involve annual minimum flow and indices of flow duration curve show inconsistent results among all study cases and hydrological regimes types; either they result in high e-flows releases while sharply reducing hydropower production or vice versa. However, so-called dynamic approaches demonstrate consistent results and are more suitable, both in terms of hydropower production and e-flows releases by therefore providing 10–35% more energy production while having little impact in several hydrological parameters.
Featured Image
Photo by American Public Power Association on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The findings of this study may serve as a starting point to initiate a new discussion on the methods and criteria that should be established regarding e-flows determination at run-of-river hydropower plants.
Perspectives
Pluvial stable hydro-sites resulted in stable hydropower production. Pluvial highly fluctuating hydro-sites showed impulsive hydropower production. Pluvial-nival hydro-sites indicated unstable hydropower production. Minimum EFMs compromised the trade-off between hydropower production and e-flows. Dynamic EFMs enhanced e-flows and maximised the hydropower production.
PhD Alban Kuriqi
Universidade de Lisboa
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Flow regime aspects in determining environmental flows and maximising energy production at run-of-river hydropower plants, Applied Energy, December 2019, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113980.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
