What is it about?
This qualitative ethnographic study in a maternity hospital, Afghanistan uses interviews with and observations of doctors, midwives and care assistants. The study included 6 weeks of observation followed by 22 semi-structured interviews and four informal group discussions with staff, two focus group discussions with women and 41 background interviews with Afghan and non-Afghan medical and cultural experts.
Photo by simon sun on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Main outcome in our paper relates to the culture of care in an Afghan maternity hospital. We found a large workload, high proportion of complicated cases and poor staff organisation affected the quality of care. Cultural values, social and family pressures influenced the motivation and priorities of healthcare providers. Nepotism and cronyism created inequality in clinical training and support and undermined the authority of management to improve standards of care. Staff without powerful connections were vulnerable in a punitive inequitable environment—fearing humiliation, blame and the loss of employment. Poor care puts the lives of women and babies at risk and was, in part, the result of conflicting priorities. The underlying motivation of staff appeared to be the socio-economic survival of their own families. The hospital culture closely mirrored the culture and core values of Afghan society. In setting priorities for women's health using the Sustainable Development Goals, understanding the context-specific pressures on staff is key to more effective programme interventions and sustainability.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Parallel worlds: An ethnography of care in an Afghan maternity hospital, Social Science & Medicine, September 2018, Elsevier, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.010.
You can read the full text:
New BU publication on maternity care & culture in Afghanistan
This interesting ethnography explores the experiences, motivations and constraints of healthcare providers in a large public Afghan maternity hospital. Arnold and colleagues identify barriers and facilitators in the delivery of care. Under the surface of this maternity hospital, social norms were in conflict with the principles of biomedicine. Contested areas included the control of knowledge, equity and the primary goal of work. The institutional culture was further complicated by pressure from powerful elites. These unseen values and pressures explain much of the disconnection between policy and implementation, education and the everyday behaviours of healthcare providers.
The following have contributed to this page