What is it about?
In a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC), the cathode catalyst layer is a complex mixture of platinum (the catalyst) and carbon (the support structure). When the cell wears out, both components fail simultaneously: Pt dissolution (platinum disappears or moves) and carbon corrosion (the carbon structure turns into gas). Until now, it was nearly impossible to tell how much each specific problem contributed to the overall drop in power. This study presents a first-of-its-kind de-convolution method to solve this mystery. The researchers used three different Membrane Electrode Assemblies (MEAs) with varying platinum loadings and subjected them to three types of Accelerated Stress Tests (ASTs): Pure Carbon Corrosion: High-voltage stress to isolate carbon rot. Pure Pt Dissolution: Voltage cycling to isolate platinum loss. Mixed Mode: A realistic "real-world" stress that triggers both. By establishing a "fingerprint" expression for carbon loss first, the team could mathematically subtract that loss from the "mixed mode" data to reveal the hidden damage caused by platinum dissolution. This approach was validated across different cathode structures, proving that the forensic "fingerprint" is a reliable way to diagnose a dying fuel cell.
Featured Image
Photo by Matthias Heyde on Unsplash
Why is it important?
To achieve the 20,000 to 40,000-hour lifespans required for heavy-duty trucking or stationary power, we must know exactly what is failing inside the cell. Without this "de-convolution," engineers are essentially shooting in the dark. This research provides: Targeted R&D: If the de-convolution reveals that 80% of power loss is due to carbon corrosion, manufacturers can focus on carbon-free supports rather than wasting money on more expensive platinum. Standardized Diagnostics: It provides a universal "diagnostic indicator" that can be used by different laboratories to compare the durability of their materials.
Perspectives
This work represents the "CSI" of electrochemistry. For years, the fuel cell community has been frustrated by the fact that CO2 evolution (carbon loss) and ECSA drop (platinum loss) are intertwined in a "messy" data set. Dhanushkodi and the team have provided the mathematical "scalpel" needed to separate these phenomena. The introduction of the "fingerprint" concept is a major conceptual shift. It suggests that every material has a predictable "death signature." Once you define that signature in a controlled test, you can identify it in the wild—even when it's buried under other failure modes. While the study also discusses the limitations of the method—noting that different MEA structures might shift the fingerprint—it sets the stage for a new era of "intelligent" durability testing. As we move toward mass-producing hydrogen vehicles, the ability to rapidly de-convolve performance loss will be essential for identifying manufacturing defects and predicting service intervals. This study is the foundation for a more transparent, data-driven approach to fuel cell sustainability.
Dr. Shankar Raman Dhanushkodi
University of British Columbia
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Carbon corrosion fingerprint development and de-convolution of performance loss according to degradation mechanism in PEM fuel cells, Journal of Power Sources, October 2013, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.033.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
