What is it about?

This addendum concerns the fact that a minor error in the structure input to an NMR prediction algorithm led to a fairly significant error in a paper comparing the performance of various NMR prediction algorithms

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The important issue here is that errors can certainly creep into papers as a result of so many subtle variables. The addendum took two years to issue after the paper but today this would not take long to address at all using modern social sharing approaches.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Addendum to “Using neural networks for 13C NMR chemical shift prediction—comparison with traditional methods” [J. Magn. Reson. 157 (2002) 242–252], Journal of Magnetic Resonance, November 2004, Elsevier, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.07.012.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page