What is it about?

This research explores how the way we perceive things influences how we apply learned experiences (like fear) to new situations, a process called generalization. Traditional theories often assume our mental picture of something stays the same, or they only look at physical differences. This paper argues that human perception is more complex: it's probabilistic (meaning we're not always 100% certain what we're seeing) and dynamic (it changes over time and based on experience). The researchers used data from fear conditioning experiments where people learned about threatening or safe circles. They developed a new computational model that represents perception not as fixed points, but as changing probability distributions, reflecting this uncertainty and dynamism. They found that this new way of modeling perception—specifically how much the perceptual distributions of a new stimulus and the learned stimulus overlap—often explained people's fear generalization behavior better than simpler models that used only direct perceptual judgments or physical differences. This suggests that the way our perception naturally varies and evolves plays a crucial role in determining how fear and other learned responses spread to new stimuli.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This study is important because it offers a more realistic way to understand the link between perception and generalization, a fundamental cognitive process underlying many behaviors like categorization, motor learning, and fear responses. By challenging the traditional view of static mental representations and incorporating the probabilistic and dynamic nature of perception, the research provides a more nuanced explanation for why individuals generalize experiences differently. This is particularly relevant for understanding conditions like anxiety disorders, where overgeneralization of fear is common. If generalization is heavily influenced by how uncertain or variable someone's perception is, rather than just their learning or memory, it could change how we approach diagnosis and treatment. The computational framework developed here, which models perception as evolving probability distributions, offers a powerful tool for future research to disentangle the specific roles of perceptual and cognitive mechanisms in shaping behavior. This work bridges theories from perception and generalization, potentially leading to refined models and a deeper understanding across various cognitive domains.

Perspectives

We've long known that how people perceive things affects how they generalize learning, but many models treated perception as something static or directly tied to physical reality. This didn't fully capture the richness of human perception, which we know is inherently uncertain and changes with experience. Our goal was to build a framework that truly reflects this 'probabilistic and dynamic' nature. Instead of thinking about stimuli as fixed points in someone's mind, we modelled them as probability distributions – reflecting that we're never perfectly certain about what we perceive. We then defined similarity not just by how far apart the average perceptions were, but by how much these uncertain distributions overlapped. Applying this to fear generalization data, we found that this more nuanced view of perception often did a better job explaining why people generalized their fear the way they did, especially compared to models assuming perfect perception. It suggests that understanding the variability and evolution of perception itself is key to understanding generalization. This approach opens exciting possibilities for exploring individual differences and potentially informing clinical perspectives on conditions like anxiety, where perceptual processes might play a larger role than previously thought.

Kenny Yu
Associatie KU Leuven

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The probabilistic and dynamic nature of perception in human generalization behavior, iScience, April 2025, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112228.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page