What is it about?
Motivating consumers to choose more sustainable options is of particular importance to sustainability stakeholders. Consumers' attitudes, moral obligations, activism, and ability are all significant predictors of their sustainable choices. Yet a relevant question raised by our paper is: what if consumers experience motivational imbalance toward the same choice? Put simply, for example, what if consumers have a strong moral obligation toward a given sustainable product but at the same time they hold less positive or even negative attitudes. Results revealed that motivational imbalance has negative effects on sustainable food choices. Motivationally imbalanced consumers showed consistently weaker intentions toward sustainable food choices than those who experience motivational balance.
Photo by Tunahan Ürkmez on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This is the first paper, to my best knowledge, which examines motivational imbalance and discusses its ramifications on consumer sustainable choices discussing at once practical implications to avoid imbalance.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Consumers’ sustainable food choices: Antecedents and motivational imbalance, International Journal of Hospitality Management, August 2020, Elsevier, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102554.
You can read the full text:
This schematic representation depicts different scenarios of motivational imbalance. Each scenario was created by grouping consumers on the basis of only two antecedents at a time (with attitude always included). Balanced motivations consistently showed stronger intentions across all scenarios. Further, within the imbalanced groups, two additional scenarios of imbalance were examined based on an opposite combination (i.e., high-low vs. low-high) of the two motives.
The following have contributed to this page