What is it about?
This study looks at how people decide whether to remember information in their heads or use tools, like notes or reminders, to help. It is well known that people make decisions based on how likely they think they are to remember something. However, this research shows that their confidence in that belief also plays a significant role. If someone says they will remember something but is not very confident about it, they’re more likely to write it down or set a reminder. The study shows that this second layer of thinking—judging how good your own judgment is—affects whether people choose to offload memory. This can help us understand how people interact with memory aids and technologies in everyday life.
Featured Image
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study offers a fresh perspective on managing our memory in everyday life. While past research has focused on whether people think they will remember something, this study shows that people’s confidence in their own judgments—their second-order metacognition—can actually change how they act. This is a critical insight for understanding real-world memory strategies, such as when people choose to use reminders, take notes, or rely on digital tools. It suggests that uncertainty about our own thinking, not just forgetfulness, drives cognitive offloading. These findings are timely as digital memory aids become more common, and they can inform the design of smarter, more adaptive technologies for learning and productivity.
Perspectives
Working on this paper offered an opportunity to rethink something often taken for granted—how people decide whether to remember something themselves or rely on external tools. What stood out most was the realization that it is not just estimations about memory performance that drive these decisions, but the confidence in those estimations. That insight shifts how everyday tools like reminders and to-do lists are viewed—not as signs of forgetfulness, but as reflections of deeper self-evaluations. It is hoped that this work encourages further exploration of the subtle but powerful ways metacognition shapes behavior.
Dr. Yuan Ma
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The influence of second-order metacognitive judgments on cognitive offloading within the monitoring-control relationship, Discover Psychology, October 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s44202-024-00258-8.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
