What is it about?

Darwin suggested that a single evolutionary process explained organic and cultural evolution. Many biologists and sociologists instead still see culture as an exceptional product of intentional, conscious human choice. I show that this is a false dichotomy. In the course of evolution, all life forms, humans included, face the same fundamental problem: to survive in unpredictable natural and social environments. Evolution enables life to respond to uncertainty by generating blind variation because this maximizes the chance of finding utility. Variation itself evolves, from blind mutation to behavioral trial and error, and eventually to the cognitive ability to anticipate and evaluate environmental change. Long-term genetic selection continues, but lifetime adaptation is increasingly guided by cognition, eventually allowing organisms to explore imagined environments in light of imagined choices and retain these in cultures. However, this shift to internal selection remains subject to the first principle of evolution: that the production of blind variety, whether genetic, behavioral or cognitive, allows organisms, including humans, to survive in an unpredictable world. Inevitably, it also brings high levels of redundancy, error and harm into the life of individuals and their culture.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Most evolutionary research has tended to treat organisms as objects rather than subjects. Individual agency played little or no role. Selection was governed by external genetic or social rational- functional constraints and produced successful outcomes. Maladaptive or redundant biological and cultural traits were dismissed as short-lived and unimportant. By looking at how evolution as experienced by the living organism we obtain a more realistic picture of the complexity of cultures. The blind, random nature of both environments and variation confronts organisms, including humans, with unpredictable flows of advantages and threats, and the results of what we intended frequently differ from what we expected. Chance, whether it opens opportunities or frustrates our plans, is the hallmark of all evolution, including that of human culture.

Perspectives

I want my article to affirm Darwin's argument that human culture is the natural product of a continuing evolutionary process. I also hope that it helps to resolve the dualism of genetic and intentional, human selection which still divides biological and sociological views of culture. The crux of this divide has been the complexity and volatility of culture. Looking at it through the eyes of the individual allows us to see the full range of cultural traits, from major achievements to ``the strangest customs and superstitions`` which, as Darwin already noted, have become all-powerful although they "stand in complete opposition to the true welfare and happiness of mankind".

Professor Bernd Baldus
University of Toronto

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: What is it Like to Evolve? Cultural Evolution as a Lived Experience, KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, May 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-024-00947-1.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page