What is it about?
We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodological quality
Featured Image
Perspectives
This systematic review is part of a wider project of the International Collaboration for Harmonising Outcomes, Research and Standards in Urogynaecology and Women’s Health (CHORUS) (i-chorus.org)
Prof Stergios K Doumouchtsis
St. George’s University of London
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set, International Urogynecology Journal, October 2018, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
