What is it about?

Between 2005 and 2013, young activists in Azerbaijan tried a new approach to promote democracy: instead of directly opposing the government, they focused on changing how people, especially youth, thought about democracy and traditional values. Through writers' groups, free universities, and cultural programs, they created spaces for open discussion and new ideas. While the government eventually shut down these movements, they left a lasting mark on Azerbaijan's urban culture and forced some positive changes. This research shows how even unsuccessful democracy movements can create meaningful social change, and how governments respond to such challenges.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Even when authoritarian governments seem to win, the story isn't over. While the government was crushing youth democracy movements, it was secretly copying them! Think government-sponsored "free thought" lectures in the same spots where they had just shut down activist gatherings. But despite being silenced, these young activists left an unexpected legacy. They changed how young Azerbaijanis think about authority, gender roles, and public life. Our research challenges the simple "repression works" story and reveals how authoritarian control is more complex - and sometimes less complete - than we thought. For anyone interested in how modern authoritarian regimes really work, or how youth movements can create change even when they "fail," Azerbaijan's story offers crucial insights.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Halted Democracy: Government Hijacking of the New Opposition in Azerbaijan, January 2019, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-26374-4_2.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page