What is it about?
Many people doubt the quality of online courses. The majority of quality evaluation systems involve either experts or learners. This paper presents a system where opinions of diverse stakeholders are counted.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Authors prove that different courses, speaking about popular science and specialized MOOCs, should not be evaluated in the same way, and offer ideas about how to strike the balance evaluating them.
Perspectives
Both MOOC producers and users may benefit from this paper: producers may borrow the page and be sure that the product they make is good enough to offer, while learners may choose the best courses judging them from the point of the quality expertise they went through.
Ulyana Zakharova
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: MOOC Quality Evaluation System: Tomsk State University Experience, January 2017, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_23.
You can read the full text:
Resources
MOOC quality evaluation system_EMOOCs 2017
This is a presentation we used at EMOOCs to show the results of our study. Please, look it up for a brief intro into the research
MOOC Quality management and research
This is a videoabstract of the study by V.Dyomin, G.Mozhaeva, O.Babanskaya and U.Zakharova performed at Tomsk State University and presented at Coursera Partners Conference and EMOOC summit in 2017. It covers the university quality management system and results of the study which answer the question "Are their universal quality criteria for different MOOCs?" Get the main idea during the first 100 seconds
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
