What is it about?
This study investigates how recycling revenues, which are generated by environmental taxes, affect growth through different types of tax cuts. A growth model with creative destruction (Aghion and Howitt Econometrica 60(2):323–351,1992, Aghion and Howitt The economics of growth, 2009) is modified to include the production of final output as a source of pollution. This paper demonstrates that introducing an environmental tax, accompanied by either an income tax cut or a profits tax reduction, increases the output growth rate. The analysis also shows that, if technological change is resulted from deliberate activities of economic agents, the reduction of the profits tax rate for an intermediate monopolist is more growth-enhancing than an income tax cut since a profits tax reduction directly promotes R&D activities.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Introducing an environmental tax, accompanied by either an income tax cut or a profits tax reduction, increases the output growth rate. In an environmental tax reform is considered, a profits tax reduction directly promotes R&D activities because the reduction of the profits tax rate for an intermediate monopolist is more growth-enhancing than an income tax cut.
Perspectives
In this model, capital is not explicitly included as a factor input; thus, capital taxation is not considered. Furthermore, what would happen if governmental expenditure was polluting? These factors require further examination.
Prof. (Associate) Minoru Nakada
Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Environmental Tax Reform and Growth: Income Tax Cuts or Profits Tax Reduction, Environmental and Resource Economics, August 2010, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-010-9392-3.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page