What is it about?
Female business students were more critical of an unethical actor (described in a written scenario) than were males. Actors were generally viewed as pressured more by the situation when acting to avoid a loss than when seeking a gain. Furthermore, acting unethically was seen as less wrong when the actor sought to prevent a small loss than when the goal was to attain a small gain. When the gain or loss in question was large, the behavior was typically seen as quite wrong.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The results imply ethical training should include a focus on becoming aware of and overcoming biases in decision-making. Discussing the effects upon victims within multiple scenarios may be helpful in promoting more consistent judgments of both wrongdoers and whistleblowers. In addition, persons acquiring a better understanding of cognitive moral development may become increasing sympathetic to whistleblowers and less inclined to retaliate against them.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Observers’ Impressions of Unethical Persons and Whistleblowers, Journal of Business Ethics, February 2007, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9283-2.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page