What is it about?
The badminton short serve was considered a good model in which to test the movement complexity hypothesis because a high degree of skill is required in order to achieve accuracy in trajectory whilst achieving accuracy in the landing location. We found that all players used a technique that would be most clearly push‐like (ie rather than throw‐like), but the most accurate servers reduced complexity by restricting motion at several joints in multiple planes; simplifying the movement to a single joint in a single plane.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Previous research has often assumed that a push‐like movement pattern is used in an accuracy‐based task, this research paper has confirmed that to be correct. However, this research has further expanded by introducing a new notion of describing a movement pattern based on the complexity with which it is executed. Furthermore, training a push‐like movement pattern allows the endpoints of the chain (ie racket) to follow a linear or flat arc path, leading to greater accuracy. Segmental rotations occur simultaneously which would be a key coaching point, allowing more control over the racket, ensuring better consistency at the racket‐shuttlecock contact point.
Perspectives
This article was very interesting to write as we expected to see some restriction in specific joints, whereas we found that the most accurate servers restricted multiple joints in multiple planes. Additionally, I hope that researchers look to employ the use of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in kinematic/kinetic studies as it takes in account all variables, not only the ones we choose.
Mr Shayne Marc Vial
Edith Cowan University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Reductions in both temporal and spatial movement pattern complexity is associated with greater performance accuracy, Translational Sports Medicine, November 2018, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/tsm2.49.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







