What is it about?
This study addresses the issue of ownership advantages affecting multinational enterprises’ (MNEs) entry mode strategies in developing countries. Using a sample of 303 foreign affiliates, this study empirically examines the choice of MNEs between a wholly owned subsidiary (WOS) and a joint venture (JV).
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Although few studies have focused on such effects, very little attention has been devoted to the ownership advantages generated from the institutional environment of MNEs’ home countries. To bridge this gap, this study concentrates on three types of ownership advantages: Intangible Asset Advantages (IAA), Advantages of Common Governance (ACG), and Home Country-Specific Advantages (HCSA). The data were collected from senior executives of MNEs’ subsidiaries operating in Syria and Jordan. The findings of this study reveal that MNEs’ choice of entry mode strategies is significantly influenced by intangible asset advantages, advantages of common governance, and home country-specific advantages. Hence, senior executives perceiving an increased importance of these assets will opt for a WOS rather than a JV when entering a new market in the Middle East.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Multinational Enterprises’ Entry Mode Strategies in Syria and Jordan: The Impact of Ownership Advantages, Thunderbird International Business Review, December 2015, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/tie.21775.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page