What is it about?
This article describes the economic evaluation of a Dutch trial, comparing endovascular approach to an open repair in patients with a ruptured acute abdominal aneurysm.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
An endovascular approach (EVAR) seems more effective than an open repair approach, but for increased costs. Based on the current standards of willingness-to-pay EVAR is unaffordable.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of endovascularversusopen repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial, British Journal of Surgery, January 2014, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9356.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
