Some of the content on this page has been created using generative AI.
What is it about?
This study evaluated the indications and added value of videourodynamic study (VUDS) over urodynamic studies (UDS) in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). VUDS provided additional information in specific situations, impacting bladder management in 67% of cases. The examination is recommended for the assessment of NLUTD, especially in men with SCI.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This research is important because it evaluates the indications and additional information provided by videourodynamic study (VUDS) over urodynamic studies (UDS) in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). The study highlights the added value of VUDS and its impact on bladder management, specifically in patients who undergo VUDS during their neuro-urological follow-up. The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the benefits of VUDS in specific situations and its impact on patient care. Key Takeaways: 1. VUDS was useful for the evaluation of NLUTD in men with SCI. 2. In specific situations, VUDS added value over standard UDS, providing additional information that impacted bladder management. 3. VUDS enabled targeted surgery in patients with obstruction, leading to reflex bladder emptying in all cases.
AI notice
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Indications and added value of videourodynamics in men with spinal cord injury, BJUI Compass, July 2024, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/bco2.370.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
Be the first to contribute to this page







