What is it about?

Humans generate vast quantities of bioavailable nitrogen for agricul- tural production, and much of the excess ends up in rivers and streams. As the nitrogen flows downstream, some of it is naturally removed by streambed sediments through a process known as hyporheic exchange. In this paper, we set out to answer the question: how does the movement of groundwater into (or out of) a stream affect the removal of nitrogen by hyporheic exchange? Multiscale and multi-physics model simula- tions suggest that groundwater movement across the streambed can ‘‘shut down’’ the physical and biologi- cal processes that remove stream nitrogen. Hence, stream-groundwater interactions may play an important role in modulating the human and environmental impacts of nitrogen pollution.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There is an urgent need for modeling tools that can provide realistic estimates for the nitrate uptake veloc- ity in support of regulatory, ecological, and sustainability goals, including implementation of total maximum daily loads for nitrogen impaired streams [French et al., 2006], stream restoration efforts to improve the retention and removal of bioavailable nitrogen [Craig et al., 2008], and long-term forecasts of the effects of land-use and climate change on water resources at the watershed scale [Grathwohl et al., 2013]. To this end, several process-based models for vf have been proposed, but these: (1) do not consider the multiscale nature of hyporheic exchange flows and, in particular, the impact of ambient groundwater flow on hypo- rheic exchange; (2) rely on simplified conceptualizations of mixing within streambed sediments (e.g., a well- mixed box); (3) neglect important steps in the N-cycle (e.g., nitrification and ammonification); and/or (4) adopt pseudo-first-order kinetic descriptions of denitrification [Stream Solute Workshop, 1990; Runkel, 2007; Yang and Wang, 2010]. The first limitation is particularly concerning given that groundwater resources are increasingly under stress from urbanization, agricultural activities, groundwater mining, and climate change [Walsh et al., 2005; Green et al., 2011; Askarizadeh et al., 2015]. The effects of ambient groundwater flow on in-stream ecosystem services are largely unknown [Boulton et al., 2010; Grathwohl et al., 2013; Wondzell, 2015]. In this paper, we develop and test a simple and scalable process-based model for estimating the nitrate uptake velocity that addresses the limitations identified above. In particular, our model accounts for: (1) hyporheic exchange at multiple scales together with ambient groundwater flow in gaining or losing streams; (2) the broad residence time distributions characteristic of hyporheic exchange; (3) key biogeo- chemical reactions associated with N-cycling, including respiration, ammonification, nitrification, and deni- trification; and (4) the nonlinear nature of the pertinent biogeochemical reaction rates, including Monod kinetics for aerobic respiration and denitrification, and second-order kinetics for nitrification. Using this modeling framework, we systematically evaluate how changing ambient groundwater flow is likely to affect N-cycling in the hyporheic zone of streams, and compare our predictions to previously published reach- scale measurements of nitrate removal.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Ambient groundwater flow diminishes nitrate processing in the hyporheic zone of streams, Water Resources Research, May 2017, American Geophysical Union (AGU),
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr020048.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page