What is it about?
This paper presents the seasonal and longitudinal variability of the equatorial electrojet (EEJ) based on geomagnetic variation data from two electrojet stations in the northern Indian Ocean at a longitudinal separation of ~15°: i.e., at 77°E and at 93°E. One complete year of data is used (i.e., from November 2011 to October 2012) at the two longitudes and compared with the climatological model of the equatorial electrojet (EEJM-2.0)
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The results of our analysis show that (i) the monthly averaged hourly values of EEJ strength at 77°E and 93°E are overall in agreement with global characteristics of EEJ with significant departures over the year of study, (ii) the monthly average hourly daytime values at Campbell Bay and Vencode show poor correlation (r<0.7) for 5 out of 10 months, (iii) comparison of observed EEJ strengthatrespectivelongitudesandthecurrentdensitiesderivedfromEEJM-2.0 show over all agreement with significant differences for monthly mean hourly daytime values at respective longitudes, and (iv) day-to-day variability in noontime EEJ amplitudes between the two longitudes is >10nT, >20nT for 30% of quiet days, sorted by planetary index (Kp) <1 and<2.
Perspectives
This variability is reflected in monthly average values (V) mechanisms for persistent differences in EEJ on day-to-day basis are sought from perturbation of westward ion drifts by neutral winds caused by the upward propagation of gravity waves from troposphere/stratosphere into the mesosphere. These mechanisms have been identified theoretically and experimentally. The four-wave structure of ionospheric current densities obtained by EEJM-2.0 and other contemporary models closely resembles atmospheric tidal signatures and has a common origin.
Dr Nelapatla Phani Chandrasekhar
NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Characterization of seasonal and longitudinal variability of EEJ in the Indian region, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics, December 2014, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020183.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
