What is it about?
Large amounts of government cattle herd testing data were examined over long periods concerning bovine TB (bTB) breakdowns in England's High Risk Area. Areas where badgers (Meles meles) were culled by shooting or left unculled were compared, and no difference was seen in the rate of disease observed. Annual herd testing, movement control and other cattle measures brought bTB disease under control prior to mass badger culling.
Featured Image
Photo by Hans Veth on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Badger culling is controversial as an untested and unproven approach to bovine TB control. It requires large scale killing of healthy wild animals to try to cull those infected from a disease originating from cattle herds in the first place. It holds animal welfare concerns as badgers may die slowly from gunshot wounds. It divides rural communities due to high uncertainty. Bovine TB costs the taxpayer £100 m in compensation per year and distracts from the need for better cattle testing using PCR-based tests, to support testing and cattle movement controls that are still inadequate.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Analysis of the impact of badger culling on bovine tuberculosis in cattle in the high‐risk area of England, 2009–2020, Veterinary Record, March 2022, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/vetr.1384.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page