What is it about?
Metameric gill slits are mysterious structures, unique for Chordata and Hemichordata, and also, perhaps, for the extinct Cambrian Calcichordata. There is a discussed hypothesis of the gill slits origin from the metameric nephridia. According to the hypothesis, the hypothetical metameric deuterostome ancestor had in each segment a pair of coelomoducts and a pair of intestinal pockets. In the anterior segments, the coelomoducts have fused with the intestinal pockets. As a result, each nephridium opened both into the gut and into the environment. Then the dissepiments and funnels reduced in all segments except the collar one. Thus, in recent enteropneusts, only the first pair of gill slits keeps the ancestral arrangement communicating at the same time with the gut, with the environment, and with the coelom of the preceding (collar) segment. In the anterior part of the branchio-genital trunk region of enteropneusts, the metameric intestinal pockets remained, as well as the metameric coelomoducts functioning as the ducts of the metameric gonads, i.e., as the gonoducts. The consequence of the hypothesis is that the metameric gill pores originate from the metameric excreting pores, and the metameric branchial sacs originate from the metameric endodermal pockets of the gut fused with the coelomoducts. The metameric gill slits by themselves correspond with metameric openings connecting the gut with metameric intestinal pockets.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The gill slits possibly represent a synapomorphy of Deuterostomia, lost in extant echinoderms. This synapomorphy requires explanation. It is difficult to imagine from the evolutionary viewpoint how the symmetrical lateral rows of the numerous metameric paired openings leading from the gut to the exterior could form in the trunk of the general ancestor of Deuterostomia.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The nephridial hypothesis of the gill slit origin, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution, July 2015, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22645.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page