All Stories

  1. Limits to the adaptation of herbivorous spider mites to metal accumulation in homogeneous and heterogeneous environments
  2. Sex in the kitchen: non-additive effects of competition for food and reproductive interference on coexistence outcomes between closely related species.
  3. How chromosomal inversions reorient the evolutionary process
  4. Spider mites collectively avoid plants with cadmium irrespective of their frequency or the presence of competitors
  5. Evolution in abiotic environments shapes coexistence between two spider mite species
  6. Shaken, not shifted: Genotypic variation tunes how interspecific competition shapes niches
  7. Limits to the adaptation of herbivorous spider mites to metal accumulation in homogeneous and heterogeneous environments
  8. Limited host availability disrupts the genetic correlation between virulence and transmission
  9. Specific sequence of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche pre‐emption by the weak competitor
  10. Order of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche preemption by the weak competitor
  11. Virulence constrains transmission even in the absence of a genetic trade-off
  12. Order of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche preemption by the weak competitor
  13. Unboxing mutations: Connecting mutation types with evolutionary consequences
  14. Editorial: Coping With Climate Change: A Genomic Perspective on Thermal Adaptation
  15. The Adaptive Potential of the Middle Domain of Yeast Hsp90
  16. Creating outbred and inbred populations in haplodiploids to measure adaptive responses in the laboratory
  17. Selection on a single trait does not recapitulate the evolution of life-history traits seen during an invasion
  18. Comprehensive fitness maps of Hsp90 show widespread environmental dependence
  19. The adaptive potential of the M-domain of yeast Hsp90
  20. How phenotypic convergence arises in experimental evolution
  21. Evolution in the light of fitness landscape theory
  22. The fitness landscape of the codon space across environments
  23. The utility of fitness landscapes and big data for predicting evolution
  24. Playing evolution in the laboratory: From the first major evolutionary transition to global warming
  25. Let’s move beyond costs of resistance!
  26. The fitness landscape of the codon space across environments
  27. Different Genomic Changes Underlie Adaptive Evolution in Populations of Contrasting History
  28. What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger: can Fisher’s Geometric model predict antibiotic resistance evolution?
  29. Predictable phenotypic, but not karyotypic, evolution of populations with contrasting initial history
  30. Tracking changes in chromosomal arrangements and their genetic content during adaptation
  31. Keeping your options open: Maintenance of thermal plasticity during adaptation to a stable environment
  32. Wing trait-inversion associations inDrosophila subobscuracan be generalized within continents, but may change through time
  33. Evolution of mating behavior between two populations adapting to common environmental conditions
  34. History, chance and selection during phenotypic and genomic experimental evolution: replaying the tape of life at different levels
  35. How much can history constrain adaptive evolution? A real-time evolutionary approach of inversion polymorphisms inDrosophila subobscura
  36. Laboratory Selection Quickly Erases Historical Differentiation
  37. Fast evolutionary genetic differentiation during experimental colonizations
  38. From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation
  39. Climate change and chromosomal inversions in Drosophila subobscura
  40. Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
  41. CLINAL PATTERNS OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSION POLYMORPHISMS INDROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURAARE PARTLY ASSOCIATED WITH THERMAL PREFERENCES AND HEAT STRESS RESISTANCE
  42. Contrasting patterns of phenotypic variation linked to chromosomal inversions in native and colonizing populations ofDrosophila subobscura
  43. HOW REPEATABLE IS ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION? THE ROLE OF GEOGRAPHICAL ORIGIN AND FOUNDER EFFECTS IN LABORATORY ADAPTATION