All Stories

  1. Ethical opportunities and risks of using ChatGPT for open science: evidence from a three-year mixed-methods study
  2. Scientific misconduct, questionable research practices, and research climate: empirical approaches to integrity problems
  3. “Academic Slop”: Definition and Bibliometric Exploration of Its Relationship to AI Tools
  4. The Publication Activity and Migration Trends of SSH Ukrainian Scientists During the First Two Years of the Russo-Ukrainian War
  5. Use of five song titles (1964–1991) in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers
  6. Letters provide a forum for public engagement with geoengineering
  7. AI used in warfare needs a strong ethical framework
  8. Corruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier Literature Identified by ‘Tortured Phrases’: A Case Study for Bibliometric Neuroethics
  9. Raw material supplier or strategic actor? Ukraine’s future in the rare earth sector
  10. Scientific collaboration without flights: Ukraine’s wartime adaptation
  11. Review Articles, Generative AI and the Remaking of Scholarly Infrastructure
  12. Evaluating Citations and Retractions of 71 Write a Scientific Paper Guidelines
  13. Beyond metric reductionism: assessment creep as an emerging risk of research evaluation reform
  14. APC waivers and Ukraine’s publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers
  15. Gulf of Mexico or Gulf of America?
  16. A bibliometric assessment of the incidence of Eszett (ẞ; ß)-catenin and  Eszett (ẞ; ß)-glucuronidase in the indexed literature
  17. Bibliometric analysis of 71 best practice guidelines (WASP) related to scientific writing
  18. The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia
  19. Prevention of Endogamy in the Editorial Boards of University Journals
  20. Türkiye Versus Turkey: Tracking the Adoption of the Official Country Name in Academic Publishing
  21. Binary Oxide Ceramics (TiO2, ZnO, Al2O3, SiO2, CeO2, Fe2O3, and WO3) for Solar Cell Applications: A Comparative and Bibliometric Analysis
  22. Unsolicited Emails Following Preprint Publications as an Emerging Academic Issue
  23. GAIDeT: a practical taxonomy for declaring AI use in research and publishing
  24. GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing
  25. Binary Oxide Ceramics (TiO₂, ZnO, Al₂O₃, SiO₂, CeO₂, Fe₂O₃, WO₃) for Solar Cell Applications: A Comparative and Bibliometric Analysis
  26. A scoping review of studies on ruscism: tracing the academic and political evolution of a controversial term
  27. Electrochemical Etching vs. Electrochemical Deposition: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis
  28. (Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex
  29. Extending the CARE Principles: managing data for vulnerable communities in wartime and humanitarian crises
  30. Reinventing the Letter to the Editor in Science: A Dedicated Preprint Server
  31. Acknowledgments in scientific papers by Ukrainian researchers during the initial years of the Russo-Ukrainian war
  32. Ga₂O₃ solar-blind photodetectors: From civilian applications to missile detection and research agenda
  33. Paradoxical growth of publications by authors from developing countries in gold open access journals: a commentary on Dr. Cernat’s, 2024 article
  34. US election has profound implications for science in Ukraine
  35. Spam, unwanted or unsolicited emails following the publication of preprints
  36. Redefining sabbaticals: A strategic investment in early career researchers’ futures
  37. The Chinese Early Warning Journal List: Strengths, weaknesses and solutions in the light of China's global scientific rise
  38. ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship
  39. The incidence of 11 movie titles in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers
  40. The video assistant referee in football
  41. Dealing with Research Paper Mills, Tortured Phrases, and Data Fabrication and Falsification in Scientific Papers
  42. Visualization of rank-citation curves for fast detection of h-index anomalies in university metrics
  43. From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper
  44. Letter to the editor: Should stricter regulations be set for the use or analysis of Twitter (and other social media) in academic publishing?
  45. Current Ethics Policies in 36 Preprint Servers: Relevance for Academic Medicine
  46. Examination of academic librarian websites in Anglophonic countries to assess the integrity of information related to predatory publishing
  47. Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review
  48. Ukrainian arts and humanities research in Scopus: a bibliometric analysis
  49. Partial citation analysis of five classes of retracted papers, and devising a new four-tier citation classification system for retracted (and other) papers
  50. What knowledge does ChatGPT have regarding open science, and can it provide good advice about it?
  51. A bibliometric assessment of the incidence of amyloid‐ Eszett (Aß), a false positive of amyloid‐ beta (Aβ), in the neurodegenerative disease literature
  52. Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”
  53. Lost for the country: country-undefined papers in Web of Science and Scopus
  54. Peculiarities of gender disambiguation and ordering of non-English authors’ names for Economic papers beyond core databases①
  55. Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers
  56. A bibliometric assessment of the existence of Eszett (ẞ; ß)-carotene, a false positive of beta (β)-carotene, in the literature
  57. Are some academic librarians providing misinformation about predatory publishing?
  58. Ukraine approves National Plan for Open Science
  59. The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
  60. Variations in the naming of malondialdehyde (MDA) in PubMed-, Scopus-, and Web of science-indexed literature
  61. Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles
  62. Doctoral students benefit from international publishing
  63. Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature
  64. Case Study: Citizen Science in Digital Humanities context
  65. Universal and specific features of Ukrainian economic research: publication analysis based on Crossref data
  66. Roadmap to FAIR Research Information in Open Infrastructures
  67. Quantitative Analysis of the Co-Publications of Ukrainian Scientists with the Nobel Laureates 1994-2018 in Science
  68. Controversial practice of rewarding for publications in national journals
  69. Quantitative Analysis of the Co-Publications of Ukrainian Scientists with the Nobel Laureates 1994-2018 in Science
  70. Plan S. Accepted not Denied
  71. The Contribution of Ukraine to the World Development of Technologies: Patent Citation Analysis of the Scientific Publications of Employees of the Ukrainian Institutions In 2009–2018
  72. Ukrainian open index maps local citations
  73. Scientometrics and management of scientific activities: once again about the global and Ukrainian
  74. Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape
  75. CROSSREF AS A SOURCE OF SCIENTOMETRIC DATA FOR SOCIAL & HUMAN SCIENCES
  76. Local Journals and Misleading Metrics: a Quantitative Analysis of Publication Activity of LIS Postgraduate Students in Ukraine
  77. Don’t dismiss citations to journals not published in English
  78. Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users
  79. Highly cited papers of Ukrainian scientists written in collaboration: A bibliometric analysis (2011-2015)
  80. War and Peace: The Peculiarities of Ukrainian-Russian Scientific Cooperation Dynamics Against the Background of Russian Military Aggression in Ukraine, in 2014-2016
  81. НЕБЕЗПЕКА ПОШИРЕННЯ ПСЕВДОНАУКОВИХ ВИДАНЬ ДЛЯ РОЗВИТКУ НАУКИ В УКРАЇНІ
  82. Evaluation of Research Activities of Universities of Ukraine and Belarus: a Set of Bibliometric Indicators and Its Implementation
  83. Recommendations on including peer reviewed open access journals in DOAJ