All Stories

  1. Use of five song titles (1964–1991) in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers
  2. Letters provide a forum for public engagement with geoengineering
  3. AI used in warfare needs a strong ethical framework
  4. Corruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier Literature Identified by ‘Tortured Phrases’: A Case Study for Bibliometric Neuroethics
  5. Raw material supplier or strategic actor? Ukraine’s future in the rare earth sector
  6. Scientific collaboration without flights: Ukraine’s wartime adaptation
  7. Review Articles, Generative AI and the Remaking of Scholarly Infrastructure
  8. Evaluating Citations and Retractions of 71 Write a Scientific Paper Guidelines
  9. APC waivers and Ukraine’s publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers
  10. Gulf of Mexico or Gulf of America?
  11. A bibliometric assessment of the incidence of Eszett (ẞ; ß)-catenin and  Eszett (ẞ; ß)-glucuronidase in the indexed literature
  12. Bibliometric analysis of 71 best practice guidelines (WASP) related to scientific writing
  13. The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia
  14. Prevention of Endogamy in the Editorial Boards of University Journals
  15. Türkiye Versus Turkey: Tracking the Adoption of the Official Country Name in Academic Publishing
  16. Binary Oxide Ceramics (TiO2, ZnO, Al2O3, SiO2, CeO2, Fe2O3, and WO3) for Solar Cell Applications: A Comparative and Bibliometric Analysis
  17. Unsolicited Emails Following Preprint Publications as an Emerging Academic Issue
  18. GAIDeT: a practical taxonomy for declaring AI use in research and publishing
  19. GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing
  20. Binary Oxide Ceramics (TiO₂, ZnO, Al₂O₃, SiO₂, CeO₂, Fe₂O₃, WO₃) for Solar Cell Applications: A Comparative and Bibliometric Analysis
  21. A scoping review of studies on ruscism: tracing the academic and political evolution of a controversial term
  22. Electrochemical Etching vs. Electrochemical Deposition: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis
  23. (Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex
  24. Extending the CARE Principles: managing data for vulnerable communities in wartime and humanitarian crises
  25. Reinventing the Letter to the Editor in Science: A Dedicated Preprint Server
  26. Acknowledgments in scientific papers by Ukrainian researchers during the initial years of the Russo-Ukrainian war
  27. Ga₂O₃ solar-blind photodetectors: From civilian applications to missile detection and research agenda
  28. Paradoxical growth of publications by authors from developing countries in gold open access journals: a commentary on Dr. Cernat’s, 2024 article
  29. US election has profound implications for science in Ukraine
  30. Spam, unwanted or unsolicited emails following the publication of preprints
  31. Redefining sabbaticals: A strategic investment in early career researchers’ futures
  32. The Chinese Early Warning Journal List: Strengths, weaknesses and solutions in the light of China's global scientific rise
  33. ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship
  34. The incidence of 11 movie titles in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers
  35. The video assistant referee in football
  36. Dealing with Research Paper Mills, Tortured Phrases, and Data Fabrication and Falsification in Scientific Papers
  37. Visualization of rank-citation curves for fast detection of h-index anomalies in university metrics
  38. From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper
  39. Letter to the editor: Should stricter regulations be set for the use or analysis of Twitter (and other social media) in academic publishing?
  40. Current Ethics Policies in 36 Preprint Servers: Relevance for Academic Medicine
  41. Examination of academic librarian websites in Anglophonic countries to assess the integrity of information related to predatory publishing
  42. Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review
  43. Ukrainian arts and humanities research in Scopus: a bibliometric analysis
  44. Partial citation analysis of five classes of retracted papers, and devising a new four-tier citation classification system for retracted (and other) papers
  45. What knowledge does ChatGPT have regarding open science, and can it provide good advice about it?
  46. A bibliometric assessment of the incidence of amyloid‐ Eszett (Aß), a false positive of amyloid‐ beta (Aβ), in the neurodegenerative disease literature
  47. Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”
  48. Lost for the country: country-undefined papers in Web of Science and Scopus
  49. Peculiarities of gender disambiguation and ordering of non-English authors’ names for Economic papers beyond core databases①
  50. Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers
  51. A bibliometric assessment of the existence of Eszett (ẞ; ß)-carotene, a false positive of beta (β)-carotene, in the literature
  52. Are some academic librarians providing misinformation about predatory publishing?
  53. Ukraine approves National Plan for Open Science
  54. The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
  55. Variations in the naming of malondialdehyde (MDA) in PubMed-, Scopus-, and Web of science-indexed literature
  56. Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles
  57. Doctoral students benefit from international publishing
  58. Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature
  59. Case Study: Citizen Science in Digital Humanities context
  60. Universal and specific features of Ukrainian economic research: publication analysis based on Crossref data
  61. Roadmap to FAIR Research Information in Open Infrastructures
  62. Quantitative Analysis of the Co-Publications of Ukrainian Scientists with the Nobel Laureates 1994-2018 in Science
  63. Controversial practice of rewarding for publications in national journals
  64. Quantitative Analysis of the Co-Publications of Ukrainian Scientists with the Nobel Laureates 1994-2018 in Science
  65. Plan S. Accepted not Denied
  66. The Contribution of Ukraine to the World Development of Technologies: Patent Citation Analysis of the Scientific Publications of Employees of the Ukrainian Institutions In 2009–2018
  67. Ukrainian open index maps local citations
  68. Scientometrics and management of scientific activities: once again about the global and Ukrainian
  69. Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape
  70. CROSSREF AS A SOURCE OF SCIENTOMETRIC DATA FOR SOCIAL & HUMAN SCIENCES
  71. Local Journals and Misleading Metrics: a Quantitative Analysis of Publication Activity of LIS Postgraduate Students in Ukraine
  72. Don’t dismiss citations to journals not published in English
  73. Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users
  74. Highly cited papers of Ukrainian scientists written in collaboration: A bibliometric analysis (2011-2015)
  75. War and Peace: The Peculiarities of Ukrainian-Russian Scientific Cooperation Dynamics Against the Background of Russian Military Aggression in Ukraine, in 2014-2016
  76. НЕБЕЗПЕКА ПОШИРЕННЯ ПСЕВДОНАУКОВИХ ВИДАНЬ ДЛЯ РОЗВИТКУ НАУКИ В УКРАЇНІ
  77. Evaluation of Research Activities of Universities of Ukraine and Belarus: a Set of Bibliometric Indicators and Its Implementation
  78. Recommendations on including peer reviewed open access journals in DOAJ