All Stories

  1. A new indirect estimation of reference intervals: truncated minimum chi-square (TMC) approach
  2. Biological variables influencing the estimation of reference limits
  3. Diagnostic efficiency in models for permissible measurement uncertainty
  4. Corrigendum to: Quantity quotient reporting versus z-value for standardizing quantitative laboratory results
  5. Corrigendum to: Bias, its minimization or circumvention to simplify internal quality assurance
  6. The influence of age and other biological variables on the estimation of reference limits of cardiac troponin T
  7. Quantity quotient reporting versus z-value for standardizing quantitative laboratory results
  8. Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals
  9. Permissible measurement uncertainty in the lower part of measurement intervals
  10. Bias, the major crux in quality assurance
  11. Supplements to a recent proposal for permissible uncertainty of measurements in laboratory medicine
  12. Equivalence limits of reference intervals for partitioning of population data. Relevant differences of reference limits
  13. Age- and Sex-Specific Dynamics in 22 Hematologic and Biochemical Analytes from Birth to Adolescence
  14. Quantity quotient reporting. Comparison of various models
  15. Optimizing the use of the “state-of-the-art” performance criteria
  16. Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine
  17. Richtwerte bei quantitativen Untersuchungen im medizinischen Laboratorium: Definitionen, Klassifikation und Grenzen der Anwendung. Empfehlungen zur Klassifizierung und Definitionen von Richtwerten quantitativer Messgrößen / Guide values for quantitativ...
  18. Guide values for quantitative examinations in medical laboratories: definitions, classification and limits of application. Recommendations for classifying and defining guide values of quantitative measurements 1 / Classification and Definition of Guide...