All Stories

  1. A Group Delphi on economic perspectives on climate policy measures. A basis for informing a Citizen Forum
  2. Die Ausblendung von Konflikten in transdisziplinärer Forschung: Viele Wege führen nach Rom. Reaktion auf B. Nölting et al. in GAIA 34/2 (2025): Wissenschaftsorganisationen als Impulsgeber einer Nachhaltigkeitstransformation
  3. Risk governance
  4. How sustainable is the digital world?
  5. Gratwanderung zwischen disziplinärer Expertise und partizipativer Politikberatung
  6. Quo vadis, Deutschland? Stand und Perspektiven der Nachhaltigkeitspolitik
  7. The crisis in Ukraine: another missed opportunity for building a more sustainable economic paradigm
  8. Will short-term behavior changes during the COVID-19 crisis evolve into low-carbon practices?
  9. Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung lehren und lernen: Workshop-Serie am Institut für transformative Nachhaltigkeitsforschung
  10. Introduction to Special Series
  11. Thirty years of GAIA: a constant in a fast-changing world
  12. Das Comeback der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung in den USA
  13. Social Perception of Systemic Risks
  14. The opportunities and risks of digitalisation for sustainable development: a systemic perspective
  15. Prologue: The “Brave New World” of Social Sciences in Interdisciplinary Risk Research
  16. Systemic Risk: The Threat to Societal Diversity and Coherence
  17. Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives
  18. Bürgerbeteiligung in der Klimapolitik: Erfahrungen, Grenzen und Aussichten
  19. Beyond the Indicators: Improving Science, Scholarship, Policy and Practice to Meet the Complex Challenges of Sustainability
  20. Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks
  21. Interdisziplinärer Synthesebericht zum Kohleausstieg: ENavi informiert die Kohlekommission
  22. Die Rolle(n) transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft bei konfliktgeladenen Transformationsprozessen
  23. Participatory Risk Governance for Reducing Disaster and Societal Risks: Collaborative Knowledge Production and Implementation
  24. Risk Governance: Application to Urban Challenges
  25. Systemic Risks: A Homomorphic Approach on the Basis of Complexity Science
  26. Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles
  27. Unintended Side Effects of the Digital Transition: European Scientists’ Messages from a Proposition-Based Expert Round Table
  28. Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies
  29. Acceptability of geothermal installations: A geoethical concept for GeoLaB
  30. Two Types of Vigilance Are Essential to Effective Hazard Management: Maintaining Both Together Is Difficult
  31. Real-World Laboratories - the Road to Transdisciplinary Research?
  32. Catastrophic risks: How can we assess and manage them?
  33. Risk Governance
  34. Correction to: Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience
  35. Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience
  36. Ein Kompass für die Energiewende: Das Kopernikus-Projekt Energiewende-Navigationssystem (ENavi) ist gestartet
  37. Entscheidungshilfe: Transdisziplinäre Forschung trägt zum Gelingen der Energiewende bei
  38. Der transdisziplinäre Ansatz des Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS): Konzept und Umsetzung
  39. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”
  40. Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German “Energiewende”
  41. A Risk Radar driven by Internet of intelligences serving for emergency management in community
  42. Quantum technology: from research to application
  43. Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation
  44. Systemic Risks: The New Kid on the Block
  45. Fünf Jahre integrative Forschung zur Energiewende: Erfahrungen und Einsichten
  46. Paris ‐ und was nun? Auf dem Weg zu verbindlichen Klimaschutzzielen
  47. Exploring smart grids with simulations in a mobile science exhibition
  48. Structured Frameworks to Increase the Transparency of the Assessment of Benefits and Risks of Medicines: Current Status and Possible Future Directions
  49. International Science and Technology Education
  50. Sea-level rise scenarios and coastal risk management
  51. Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance
  52. An Evaluation of the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainties in the IPCC Reports on Climate Change
  53. Expertise and experience: a deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance
  54. Four questions for risk communication: a response to Roger Kasperson
  55. Risikokommunikation zu Arzneimitteln in Gewässern: Ein Balanceakt
  56. Public Perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate
  57. Changing the resilience paradigm
  58. Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system?
  59. Social risk screening using a socio-political ambiguity approach: the case of organic agriculture in Iran
  60. Comment on paper: the substitution principle by Ragnar Löfstedt
  61. Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches
  62. The Distinction Between Risk and Hazard: Understanding and Use in Stakeholder Communication
  63. Open Questions of the German Energiewende: Setup and Design of Capacity Management for the German Electricity MarketOffene Fragen der Energiewende: Aufbau und Design von Kapazitätsmärkten
  64. A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment
  65. Special issue on risk management
  66. Benefit-risk trade-offs in retrospect: how major stakeholders perceive the decision-making process in the Barents Sea oil field development
  67. Risk Governance of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations
  68. A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning
  69. Perception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management
  70. Search for the ‘European way’ of taming the risks of new technologies: the EU research project iNTeg-Risk
  71. A Decision-Analysis Tool for Benefit-Risk Assessment of Nonprescription Drugs
  72. The Risk Perception Paradox-Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
  73. Diamonds Are Forever – zum GAIA-JubiläumDiamonds Are Forever – GAIA's Jubilee
  74. On the Risk Management and Risk Governance of Petroleum Operations in the Barents Sea Area
  75. Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty
  76. Nachhaltiger Umgang mit natürlichen Risiken: antizipativ, integrativ und interdisziplinär
  77. Improving the Decision-Making Process for Nonprescription Drugs: A Framework for Benefit–Risk Assessment
  78. Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe
  79. Can Participatory Modelling Support Social Learning in Marine Fisheries? Reflections from the Invest in Fish South West Project
  80. Participatory Approaches to Modelling for Improved Learning and Decision-making in Natural Resource Governance: an Editorial
  81. Rationales for Public Participation in Environmental Policy and Governance: Practitioners' Perspectives
  82. On the ontological status of the concept of risk
  83. A Comment to Ragnar Lofstedt
  84. Risk governance
  85. Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis
  86. The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change
  87. Including social impact assessment in food safety governance
  88. Potential methods and approaches to assess social impacts associated with food safety issues
  89. The SAFE FOODS framework for improved risk analysis of foods
  90. Communication about a communication technology
  91. Response to Professor Eugene Rosa’s viewpoint to our paper
  92. Concerned public and the paralysis of decision‐making: nuclear waste management policy in Germany
  93. Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making
  94. The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk
  95. A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators
  96. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain
  97. An ethical appraisal of hormesis: toward a rational discourse on the acceptability of risks and benefits
  98. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review – Part 2: Integrative Approaches
  99. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review Part 1: Disciplinary Risk Concepts
  100. Precaution and analysis: two sides of the same coin?
  101. Risk Communication – Consumers Between Information and Irritation1
  102. Precautionary Risk Regulation in European Governance
  103. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance
  104. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies
  105. Responding Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan
  106. Risk perception and communication: Lessons for the Food and Food Packaging Industry
  107. Perception of risks
  108. Perception of Risks
  109. Social assessment of waste energy utilization scenarios
  110. Acrylamide: Lessons for Risk Management and Communication
  111. Hormesis and risk communication
  112. Hormesis: implications for policy making and risk communication: a reply
  113. A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies1
  114. The role of social science in environmental policy making: experiences and outlook
  115. The need for integration: risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large
  116. Introduction: Public understanding of genetic engineering
  117. Summary
  118. A Model for an Analytic−Deliberative Process in Risk Management
  119. Implications of the hormesis hypothesis for risk perception and communication
  120. How to Apply the Concept of Sustainability to a Region
  121. The role of risk perception for risk management
  122. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges
  123. The Brent Spar Controversy: An Example of Risk Communication Gone Wrong
  124. A regional concept of qualitative growth and sustainability—support for a case study in the German State of Baden-Württemberg
  125. Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective
  126. Eliciting and Classifying Concerns: A Methodological Critique
  127. Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework
  128. Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk: Implications for Theory Construction and Decision Making
  129. Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure
  130. Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public
  131. The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications
  132. Doing the right thing in exporting hazardous technologies
  133. A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi
  134. Public responses to the chernobyl accident
  135. Risk Communication at the Community Level: European Lessons from the Seveso Directive
  136. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
  137. Structuring West Germany's energy objectives
  138. Decision analytic tools for resolving uncertainty in the energy debate
  139. Akzeptanzforschung: Technik in der gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzung
  140. An empirical investigation of citizens' preferences among four energy scenarios
  141. Psychological and sociological approaches to study risk perception