All Stories

  1. How sustainable is the digital world?
  2. Gratwanderung zwischen disziplinärer Expertise und partizipativer Politikberatung
  3. Quo vadis, Deutschland? Stand und Perspektiven der Nachhaltigkeitspolitik
  4. The crisis in Ukraine: another missed opportunity for building a more sustainable economic paradigm
  5. Will short-term behavior changes during the COVID-19 crisis evolve into low-carbon practices?
  6. Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung lehren und lernen: Workshop-Serie am Institut für transformative Nachhaltigkeitsforschung
  7. Introduction to Special Series
  8. Thirty years of GAIA: a constant in a fast-changing world
  9. Das Comeback der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung in den USA
  10. Social Perception of Systemic Risks
  11. The opportunities and risks of digitalisation for sustainable development: a systemic perspective
  12. Prologue: The “Brave New World” of Social Sciences in Interdisciplinary Risk Research
  13. Systemic Risk: The Threat to Societal Diversity and Coherence
  14. Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives
  15. Bürgerbeteiligung in der Klimapolitik: Erfahrungen, Grenzen und Aussichten
  16. Beyond the Indicators: Improving Science, Scholarship, Policy and Practice to Meet the Complex Challenges of Sustainability
  17. Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks
  18. Interdisziplinärer Synthesebericht zum Kohleausstieg: ENavi informiert die Kohlekommission
  19. Die Rolle(n) transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft bei konfliktgeladenen Transformationsprozessen
  20. Participatory Risk Governance for Reducing Disaster and Societal Risks: Collaborative Knowledge Production and Implementation
  21. Risk Governance: Application to Urban Challenges
  22. Systemic Risks: A Homomorphic Approach on the Basis of Complexity Science
  23. Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles
  24. Unintended Side Effects of the Digital Transition: European Scientists’ Messages from a Proposition-Based Expert Round Table
  25. Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies
  26. Acceptability of geothermal installations: A geoethical concept for GeoLaB
  27. Two Types of Vigilance Are Essential to Effective Hazard Management: Maintaining Both Together Is Difficult
  28. Real-World Laboratories - the Road to Transdisciplinary Research?
  29. Catastrophic risks: How can we assess and manage them?
  30. Risk Governance
  31. Correction to: Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience
  32. Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience
  33. Ein Kompass für die Energiewende: Das Kopernikus-Projekt Energiewende-Navigationssystem (ENavi) ist gestartet
  34. Entscheidungshilfe: Transdisziplinäre Forschung trägt zum Gelingen der Energiewende bei
  35. Der transdisziplinäre Ansatz des Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS): Konzept und Umsetzung
  36. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”
  37. Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German “Energiewende”
  38. A Risk Radar driven by Internet of intelligences serving for emergency management in community
  39. Quantum technology: from research to application
  40. Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation
  41. Systemic Risks: The New Kid on the Block
  42. Fünf Jahre integrative Forschung zur Energiewende: Erfahrungen und Einsichten
  43. Paris ‐ und was nun? Auf dem Weg zu verbindlichen Klimaschutzzielen
  44. Exploring smart grids with simulations in a mobile science exhibition
  45. Structured Frameworks to Increase the Transparency of the Assessment of Benefits and Risks of Medicines: Current Status and Possible Future Directions
  46. International Science and Technology Education
  47. Sea-level rise scenarios and coastal risk management
  48. Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance
  49. An Evaluation of the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainties in the IPCC Reports on Climate Change
  50. Expertise and experience: a deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance
  51. Four questions for risk communication: a response to Roger Kasperson
  52. Risikokommunikation zu Arzneimitteln in Gewässern: Ein Balanceakt
  53. Public Perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate
  54. Changing the resilience paradigm
  55. Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system?
  56. Social risk screening using a socio-political ambiguity approach: the case of organic agriculture in Iran
  57. Comment on paper: the substitution principle by Ragnar Löfstedt
  58. Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches
  59. The Distinction Between Risk and Hazard: Understanding and Use in Stakeholder Communication
  60. Open Questions of the German Energiewende: Setup and Design of Capacity Management for the German Electricity MarketOffene Fragen der Energiewende: Aufbau und Design von Kapazitätsmärkten
  61. A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment
  62. Special issue on risk management
  63. Benefit-risk trade-offs in retrospect: how major stakeholders perceive the decision-making process in the Barents Sea oil field development
  64. Risk Governance of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations
  65. A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning
  66. Perception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management
  67. Search for the ‘European way’ of taming the risks of new technologies: the EU research project iNTeg-Risk
  68. A Decision-Analysis Tool for Benefit-Risk Assessment of Nonprescription Drugs
  69. The Risk Perception Paradox-Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
  70. Diamonds Are Forever – zum GAIA-JubiläumDiamonds Are Forever – GAIA's Jubilee
  71. On the Risk Management and Risk Governance of Petroleum Operations in the Barents Sea Area
  72. Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty
  73. Nachhaltiger Umgang mit natürlichen Risiken: antizipativ, integrativ und interdisziplinär
  74. Improving the Decision-Making Process for Nonprescription Drugs: A Framework for Benefit–Risk Assessment
  75. Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe
  76. Can Participatory Modelling Support Social Learning in Marine Fisheries? Reflections from the Invest in Fish South West Project
  77. Participatory Approaches to Modelling for Improved Learning and Decision-making in Natural Resource Governance: an Editorial
  78. Rationales for Public Participation in Environmental Policy and Governance: Practitioners' Perspectives
  79. On the ontological status of the concept of risk
  80. A Comment to Ragnar Lofstedt
  81. Risk governance
  82. Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis
  83. The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change
  84. Including social impact assessment in food safety governance
  85. Potential methods and approaches to assess social impacts associated with food safety issues
  86. The SAFE FOODS framework for improved risk analysis of foods
  87. Communication about a communication technology
  88. Response to Professor Eugene Rosa’s viewpoint to our paper
  89. Concerned public and the paralysis of decision‐making: nuclear waste management policy in Germany
  90. Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making
  91. The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk
  92. A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators
  93. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain
  94. An ethical appraisal of hormesis: toward a rational discourse on the acceptability of risks and benefits
  95. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review – Part 2: Integrative Approaches
  96. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review Part 1: Disciplinary Risk Concepts
  97. Precaution and analysis: two sides of the same coin?
  98. Risk Communication – Consumers Between Information and Irritation1
  99. Precautionary Risk Regulation in European Governance
  100. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance
  101. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies
  102. Responding Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan
  103. Risk perception and communication: Lessons for the Food and Food Packaging Industry
  104. Perception of risks
  105. Perception of Risks
  106. Social assessment of waste energy utilization scenarios
  107. Acrylamide: Lessons for Risk Management and Communication
  108. Hormesis and risk communication
  109. Hormesis: implications for policy making and risk communication: a reply
  110. A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies1
  111. The role of social science in environmental policy making: experiences and outlook
  112. The need for integration: risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large
  113. Introduction: Public understanding of genetic engineering
  114. Summary
  115. A Model for an Analytic−Deliberative Process in Risk Management
  116. Implications of the hormesis hypothesis for risk perception and communication
  117. How to Apply the Concept of Sustainability to a Region
  118. The role of risk perception for risk management
  119. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges
  120. The Brent Spar Controversy: An Example of Risk Communication Gone Wrong
  121. A regional concept of qualitative growth and sustainability—support for a case study in the German State of Baden-Württemberg
  122. Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective
  123. Eliciting and Classifying Concerns: A Methodological Critique
  124. Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework
  125. Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk: Implications for Theory Construction and Decision Making
  126. Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure
  127. Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public
  128. The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications
  129. Doing the right thing in exporting hazardous technologies
  130. A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi
  131. Public responses to the chernobyl accident
  132. Risk Communication at the Community Level: European Lessons from the Seveso Directive
  133. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
  134. Structuring West Germany's energy objectives
  135. Decision analytic tools for resolving uncertainty in the energy debate
  136. Akzeptanzforschung: Technik in der gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzung
  137. An empirical investigation of citizens' preferences among four energy scenarios
  138. Psychological and sociological approaches to study risk perception