All Stories

  1. A Group Delphi on economic perspectives on climate policy measures. A basis for informing a Citizen Forum
  2. Die Ausblendung von Konflikten in transdisziplinärer Forschung: Viele Wege führen nach Rom. Reaktion auf B. Nölting et al. in GAIA 34/2 (2025): Wissenschaftsorganisationen als Impulsgeber einer Nachhaltigkeitstransformation
  3. Conclusions and Outlook
  4. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation
  5. Introduction
  6. Risk governance
  7. How sustainable is the digital world?
  8. Gratwanderung zwischen disziplinärer Expertise und partizipativer Politikberatung
  9. Quo vadis, Deutschland? Stand und Perspektiven der Nachhaltigkeitspolitik
  10. The crisis in Ukraine: another missed opportunity for building a more sustainable economic paradigm
  11. Will short-term behavior changes during the COVID-19 crisis evolve into low-carbon practices?
  12. Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung lehren und lernen: Workshop-Serie am Institut für transformative Nachhaltigkeitsforschung
  13. Introduction to Special Series
  14. Thirty years of GAIA: a constant in a fast-changing world
  15. Das Comeback der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung in den USA
  16. Social Perception of Systemic Risks
  17. The opportunities and risks of digitalisation for sustainable development: a systemic perspective
  18. Prologue: The “Brave New World” of Social Sciences in Interdisciplinary Risk Research
  19. Systemic Risk: The Threat to Societal Diversity and Coherence
  20. Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives
  21. Bürgerbeteiligung in der Klimapolitik: Erfahrungen, Grenzen und Aussichten
  22. Beyond the Indicators: Improving Science, Scholarship, Policy and Practice to Meet the Complex Challenges of Sustainability
  23. Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks
  24. Interdisziplinärer Synthesebericht zum Kohleausstieg: ENavi informiert die Kohlekommission
  25. Die Rolle(n) transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft bei konfliktgeladenen Transformationsprozessen
  26. Participatory Risk Governance for Reducing Disaster and Societal Risks: Collaborative Knowledge Production and Implementation
  27. Risk Governance: Application to Urban Challenges
  28. Systemic Risks: A Homomorphic Approach on the Basis of Complexity Science
  29. Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles
  30. Unintended Side Effects of the Digital Transition: European Scientists’ Messages from a Proposition-Based Expert Round Table
  31. Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies
  32. Acceptability of geothermal installations: A geoethical concept for GeoLaB
  33. Two Types of Vigilance Are Essential to Effective Hazard Management: Maintaining Both Together Is Difficult
  34. Real-World Laboratories - the Road to Transdisciplinary Research?
  35. Catastrophic risks: How can we assess and manage them?
  36. Risk Governance
  37. Correction to: Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience
  38. Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience
  39. Ein Kompass für die Energiewende: Das Kopernikus-Projekt Energiewende-Navigationssystem (ENavi) ist gestartet
  40. Entscheidungshilfe: Transdisziplinäre Forschung trägt zum Gelingen der Energiewende bei
  41. Der transdisziplinäre Ansatz des Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS): Konzept und Umsetzung
  42. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”
  43. Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German “Energiewende”
  44. A Risk Radar driven by Internet of intelligences serving for emergency management in community
  45. Quantum technology: from research to application
  46. Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation
  47. Systemic Risks: The New Kid on the Block
  48. Fünf Jahre integrative Forschung zur Energiewende: Erfahrungen und Einsichten
  49. Paris ‐ und was nun? Auf dem Weg zu verbindlichen Klimaschutzzielen
  50. Exploring smart grids with simulations in a mobile science exhibition
  51. Structured Frameworks to Increase the Transparency of the Assessment of Benefits and Risks of Medicines: Current Status and Possible Future Directions
  52. International Science and Technology Education
  53. Sea-level rise scenarios and coastal risk management
  54. Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance
  55. An Evaluation of the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainties in the IPCC Reports on Climate Change
  56. Expertise and experience: a deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance
  57. Four questions for risk communication: a response to Roger Kasperson
  58. Risikokommunikation zu Arzneimitteln in Gewässern: Ein Balanceakt
  59. Public Perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate
  60. Changing the resilience paradigm
  61. Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system?
  62. Social risk screening using a socio-political ambiguity approach: the case of organic agriculture in Iran
  63. Comment on paper: the substitution principle by Ragnar Löfstedt
  64. Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches
  65. The Distinction Between Risk and Hazard: Understanding and Use in Stakeholder Communication
  66. Open Questions of the German Energiewende: Setup and Design of Capacity Management for the German Electricity MarketOffene Fragen der Energiewende: Aufbau und Design von Kapazitätsmärkten
  67. A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment
  68. Special issue on risk management
  69. Benefit-risk trade-offs in retrospect: how major stakeholders perceive the decision-making process in the Barents Sea oil field development
  70. Risk Governance of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations
  71. A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning
  72. Perception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management
  73. Search for the ‘European way’ of taming the risks of new technologies: the EU research project iNTeg-Risk
  74. A Decision-Analysis Tool for Benefit-Risk Assessment of Nonprescription Drugs
  75. The Risk Perception Paradox-Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
  76. Diamonds Are Forever – zum GAIA-JubiläumDiamonds Are Forever – GAIA's Jubilee
  77. On the Risk Management and Risk Governance of Petroleum Operations in the Barents Sea Area
  78. Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty
  79. Nachhaltiger Umgang mit natürlichen Risiken: antizipativ, integrativ und interdisziplinär
  80. Improving the Decision-Making Process for Nonprescription Drugs: A Framework for Benefit–Risk Assessment
  81. Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe
  82. Can Participatory Modelling Support Social Learning in Marine Fisheries? Reflections from the Invest in Fish South West Project
  83. Participatory Approaches to Modelling for Improved Learning and Decision-making in Natural Resource Governance: an Editorial
  84. Rationales for Public Participation in Environmental Policy and Governance: Practitioners' Perspectives
  85. On the ontological status of the concept of risk
  86. A Comment to Ragnar Lofstedt
  87. Risk governance
  88. Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis
  89. The social amplification/attenuation of risk framework: application to climate change
  90. Including social impact assessment in food safety governance
  91. Potential methods and approaches to assess social impacts associated with food safety issues
  92. The SAFE FOODS framework for improved risk analysis of foods
  93. Communication about a communication technology
  94. Response to Professor Eugene Rosa’s viewpoint to our paper
  95. Concerned public and the paralysis of decision‐making: nuclear waste management policy in Germany
  96. Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making
  97. The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk
  98. A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators
  99. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain
  100. An ethical appraisal of hormesis: toward a rational discourse on the acceptability of risks and benefits
  101. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review – Part 2: Integrative Approaches
  102. Concepts of Risk: An Interdisciplinary Review Part 1: Disciplinary Risk Concepts
  103. Precaution and analysis: two sides of the same coin?
  104. Risk Communication – Consumers Between Information and Irritation1
  105. Precautionary Risk Regulation in European Governance
  106. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance
  107. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies
  108. Responding Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan
  109. Risk perception and communication: Lessons for the Food and Food Packaging Industry
  110. Perception of risks
  111. Perception of Risks
  112. Social assessment of waste energy utilization scenarios
  113. Acrylamide: Lessons for Risk Management and Communication
  114. Hormesis and risk communication
  115. Hormesis: implications for policy making and risk communication: a reply
  116. A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies1
  117. The role of social science in environmental policy making: experiences and outlook
  118. The need for integration: risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large
  119. Introduction: Public understanding of genetic engineering
  120. Summary
  121. A Model for an Analytic−Deliberative Process in Risk Management
  122. Implications of the hormesis hypothesis for risk perception and communication
  123. How to Apply the Concept of Sustainability to a Region
  124. The role of risk perception for risk management
  125. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges
  126. The Brent Spar Controversy: An Example of Risk Communication Gone Wrong
  127. A regional concept of qualitative growth and sustainability—support for a case study in the German State of Baden-Württemberg
  128. Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective
  129. Eliciting and Classifying Concerns: A Methodological Critique
  130. Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework
  131. Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk: Implications for Theory Construction and Decision Making
  132. Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure
  133. Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public
  134. The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications
  135. Doing the right thing in exporting hazardous technologies
  136. A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi
  137. Public responses to the chernobyl accident
  138. Risk Communication at the Community Level: European Lessons from the Seveso Directive
  139. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
  140. Structuring West Germany's energy objectives
  141. Decision analytic tools for resolving uncertainty in the energy debate
  142. Akzeptanzforschung: Technik in der gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzung
  143. An empirical investigation of citizens' preferences among four energy scenarios
  144. Psychological and sociological approaches to study risk perception