All Stories

  1. Selective Moral Leniency Toward Culturally Embedded Animal Exploitation: The Role of Identity and Ideology
  2. Speciesism and the psychology of animal exploitation
  3. Contact ruptures: How ecological shifts reshape intergroup contact and outgroup attitudes.
  4. Cognitive Liberalisation Through a Different Lens: Intergroup Contact Attenuates the Relationship Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Intergroup Bias Across Three Contexts
  5. Reply to ‘Student evaluations of teaching should not be abandoned’
  6. Primary and secondary generalization effects from Black and gay contact: Longitudinal evidence of between‐ and within‐person effects
  7. It is time to abandon student evaluations of teaching
  8. The Evolving Nature of Generalized Prejudice Toward Marginalized Groups in the United States 2004–2020
  9. Exploring Secondary Transfer Generalisation Effects From Black and Gay Contact: The Role of Humanisation
  10. Fluctuations in Prejudice Do Not Track Fluctuations in Ordinary Contact in Three 5-Wave “Shortitudinal” Studies Examining Daily, Weekly, or Monthly Intervals
  11. Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer (1940–2024).
  12. Replicating and extending Sengupta et al. (2023): Contact predicts no within-person longitudinal outgroup-bias change.
  13. Mind the (Construct-Measurement) Gap
  14. A cautionary note on interpreting research findings in the presence of statistical suppression
  15. Ideologically‐based contact avoidance during a pandemic: Blunt or selective distancing from ‘others’?
  16. Dealing with declining dominance: White identification and anti-immigrant hostility in the US
  17. Privilege lost: How dominant groups react to shifts in cultural primacy and power
  18. Reductions in perceived COVID‐19 threat amid UK’s mass public vaccination programme coincide with reductions in outgroup avoidance (but not prejudice)
  19. Reconsidering reconsent: Threats to internal and external validity when participants reconsent after debriefing
  20. News media impact on sociopolitical attitudes
  21. Food technology neophobia as a psychological barrier to clean meat acceptance
  22. Fighting over who dictates the nature of prejudice
  23. Double-pronged bias against black women: Sexism and racism (but not right-wing ideology) as unique predictors.
  24. Construct jangle or construct mangle? Thinking straight about (nonredundant) psychological constructs
  25. Pushing Back Against the Microaggression Pushback in Academic Psychology: Reflections on a Concept-Creep Paradox
  26. Butchers’ and deli workers’ psychological adaptation to meat.
  27. Friendship and romance across the U.S. political divide: Hindrance or help for outgroup political attitudes?
  28. The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact
  29. Questioning white losses and anti-white discrimination in the United States
  30. Language framing shapes dehumanization of groups: A successful replication and extension of Cooley et al. (2017).
  31. Left-right differences in perspective-taking across US states
  32. Eating with our eyes (closed): Effects of visually associating animals with meat on antivegan/vegetarian attitudes and meat consumption willingness
  33. On the Generalization of Intergroup Contact: A Taxonomy of Transfer Effects
  34. Aggression Toward Sexualized Women Is Mediated by Decreased Perceptions of Humanness
  35. Why Pillory Hillary? Testing the endemic sexism hypothesis regarding the 2016 U.S. election
  36. Right‐wing adherence and objective numeracy as predictors of minority group size perceptions and size threat reactions
  37. When and why is religious attendance associated with antigay bias and gay rights opposition? A justification-suppression model approach.
  38. Intergroup Contact as an Agent of Cognitive Liberalization
  39. Left-right differences in abortion policy support in America: Clarifying the role of sex and sexism in a nationally representative 2016 sample
  40. Longitudinal effects of human supremacy beliefs and vegetarianism threat on moral exclusion (vs. inclusion) of animals
  41. When intergroup contact is uncommon and bias is strong: the case of anti-transgender bias
  42. Is the Dark Triad common factor distinct from low Honesty-Humility?
  43. Prejudice in the wake of terrorism: The role of temporal distance, ideology, and intergroup emotions
  44. Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support)
  45. What's your beef with vegetarians? Predicting anti-vegetarian prejudice from pro-beef attitudes across cultures
  46. Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences
  47. Bowing and kicking: Rediscovering the fundamental link between generalized authoritarianism and generalized prejudice
  48. Can left-right differences in abortion support be explained by sexism?
  49. Racial Identity
  50. Social Dominance Orientation
  51. Social Identity Theory (SIT)
  52. Multilevel Intergroup Contact and Antigay Prejudice (Explicit and Implicit)
  53. Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human-Animal Relations Model (SD-HARM)
  54. Avoiding cultural contamination: Intergroup disgust sensitivity and religious identification as predictors of interfaith threat, faith-based policies, and islamophobia
  55. Surfing for Sexual Sin: Relations Between Religiousness and Viewing Sexual Content Online
  56. Who Needs Imagined Contact?
  57. Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change
  58. Derogating humor as a delegitimization strategy in intergroup contexts.
  59. From outgroups to allied forces: Effect of intergroup cooperation in violent and nonviolent video games on boosting favorable outgroup attitudes.
  60. They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.
  61. It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target
  62. Video game play and intergroup relations: Real world implications for prejudice and discrimination
  63. The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right-wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta-analytic Review
  64. Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Asexuals (ATA) scale
  65. Brothers and sisters in arms: Intergroup cooperation in a violent shooter game can reduce intergroup bias.
  66. The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity
  67. Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation
  68. Does Lower Cognitive Ability Predict Greater Prejudice?
  69. Do American States with More Religious or Conservative Populations Search More for Sexual Content on Google?
  70. Is subjective ambivalence toward gays a modern form of bias?
  71. Tapping generalized essentialism to predict outgroup prejudices
  72. Can (elaborated) imagined contact interventions reduce prejudice among those higher in intergroup disgust sensitivity (ITG-DS)?
  73. Reasoning Ability and Ideology
  74. The development of online cross-group relationships among university students
  75. Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption?
  76. Is it impolite to discuss cognitive differences between liberals and conservatives?
  77. Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations
  78. Does “humanization” of the preborn explain why conservatives (vs. liberals) oppose abortion?
  79. Risk Propensity Among Liberals and Conservatives
  80. Lay beliefs about the causes of and solutions to dehumanization and prejudice: do nonexperts recognize the role of human-animal relations?
  81. Is Homophobia Associated with an Implicit Same-Sex Attraction?
  82. The happy cyclist: Examining the association between generalized authoritarianism and subjective well-being
  83. The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations
  84. Relations between risk perceptions and socio-political ideology are domain- and ideology- dependent
  85. Of babies and bathwater, and rabbits and rabbit holes: A plea for conflict prevention, not conflict promotion
  86. Expecting racial outgroups to view “us” as biased: A social projection explanation of Whites’ bias meta-stereotypes
  87. Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice
  88. Advances in Intergroup Contact
  89. Intergroup bias toward “Group X”: Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals
  90. Intergroup disgust sensitivity as a predictor of islamophobia: The modulating effect of fear
  91. Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes
  92. When Closing the Human–Animal Divide Expands Moral Concern
  93. Do Ideologically Intolerant People Benefit From Intergroup Contact?
  94. `Where the rubber hits the road’ en route to inter-group harmony: Examining contact intentions and contact behaviour under meta-stereotype threat
  95. Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance
  96. Prejudice-relevant correlates of humor temperaments and humor styles
  97. A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): Cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives.
  98. What Did You Just Call Me? European and American Ratings of the Valence of Ethnophaulisms
  99. Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal—human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization
  100. The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice
  101. Experiencing Alien-Nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals
  102. Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals
  103. The puzzling person–situation schism in prejudice research
  104. Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons
  105. Justice, Morality, and the Dehumanization of Refugees
  106. Interpersonal Disgust, Ideological Orientations, and Dehumanization as Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes
  107. The Role of Lay Perceptions of Ethnic Prejudice in the Maintenance and Perpetuation of Ethnic Bias
  108. Testing the Generality of the Name Letter Effect: Name Initials and Everyday Attitudes
  109. Aversive racism in Britain: the use of inadmissible evidence in legal decisions
  110. Lay perceptions of ethnic prejudice: causes, solutions, and individual differences
  111. Prejudice against drug users II — the enemy within
  112. A Theory of Uncertainty Orientation
  113. Prejudice against heroin users
  114. Uncertainty Orientation in the Group Context: Categorization Effects on Persuasive Message Processing
  115. The theory of uncertainty orientation: a mathematical reformulation
  116. Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination
  117. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States and Canada in Response to the September 11, 2001 "Attack on America"
  118. Distancing oneself from negative attributes and the personal/group discrimination discrepancy
  119. Processes in Racial Discrimination: Differential Weighting of Conflicting Information
  120. Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
  121. The Role of Attitudinal Ambivalence in Susceptibility to Consensus Information
  122. Just who favors in in-group? Personality differences in reactions to uncertainty in the minimal group paradigm.
  123. Uncertainty Orientation and the Big Five Personality Structure
  124. Groupthink and uncertainty orientation: Personality differences in reactivity to the group situation.
  125. Aversive Racism: Bias without Intention
  126. Instrumental Relations Among Groups: Group Competition, Conflict, and Prejudice
  127. On the Nature of Contemporary Prejudice: From Subtle Bias to Severe Consequences