All Stories

  1. Can Survivors of Stroke Use a Co-Designed Website Aimed at Improving Physical Activity Levels and Diet Quality to Reduce the Risk of Recurrent Stroke? A Feasibility and Usability Study
  2. Working together effectively in research: Co-design and evaluation of capacity-building modules for researchers and people with lived experience of stroke
  3. Do process evaluations open up the ‘black box’ of implementation interventions in health care? A scoping review
  4. Incorporating “moving more and sitting less” into daily activities of hospitalised older medical patients: a stakeholder-directed systematic review with meta-analysis of complex interventions
  5. Does a champion-led implementation toolkit have the potential to improve aphasia guideline adherence? Results from a feasibility study
  6. Developing and applying a usability testing methodology for a website with survivors of stroke and caregivers: a tutorial (Preprint)
  7. A scoping review of community-based stroke rehabilitation in low-resource settings
  8. Exploring current practices and opportunities to address cognitive changes post-stroke: a qualitative study of health professionals
  9. Working together effectively in research: Co-design and evaluation of capacity-building modules for researchers and people with lived experience of stroke
  10. Staff and Referrer Experiences and Challenges With a New Emergency Department Avoidance Service for Older People: A Qualitative Study
  11. Transforming Community‐Based Rehabilitation Services: A National Redesign Using Experience‐Based Co‐Design
  12. Tutorial on Usability Testing a Digital Intervention with Survivors of Stroke, Including Those with Communication Difficulties: A Methodological Guide (Preprint)
  13. Creation of EmpowerMe, a co-designed website to promote self-efficacy in survivors of stroke (Preprint)
  14. Creation of EmpowerMe website to promote self-efficacy in survivors of stroke: a co-design study (Preprint)
  15. Do self-management interventions improve self-efficacy and health-related quality of life after stroke? A systematic review
  16. Co-designing the “Adherence Counselling Toolkit (ACT now)” to promote exercise adherence of survivors of stroke
  17. Training and education provided to local change champions within implementation trials: a rapid systematic review
  18. Credit where it’s due: Recognising lived experience in research authorship
  19. Conceptualising Centres of Clinical Excellence: A Scoping Review
  20. Research Coproduction: How Can Coproduction Teams Increase Traffic on the Pathway to Impact? Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact"
  21. Adapting a Telehealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention to a Co-Designed Website for Self-Management After Stroke: Tutorial
  22. Establishing Quality Indicators and Implementation Priorities for Post‐Stroke Aphasia Services Through End‐User Involvement
  23. How to Work Effectively With Stroke Survivors Throughout the Research Process
  24. Co-designing resources for rehabilitation via telehealth for people with moderate to severe disability post stroke
  25. Predictors of mortality shortly after entering a long-term care facility
  26. Clinical research imperatives: principles and priorities from the perspective of Allied Health executives and managers
  27. Criteria and Indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Global Consensus Facilitated by ISRRA
  28. Can conference participation lead to changes in clinical and research practice in stroke care? A survey of stroke conference attendees
  29. Essential content for teaching implementation practice in healthcare: a mixed-methods study of teams offering capacity-building initiatives
  30. Codesigning implementation strategies to improve evidence‐based stroke rehabilitation: A feasibility study
  31. Secondary prevention of stroke. A telehealth-delivered physical activity and diet pilot randomized trial (ENAbLE-pilot)
  32. Is learning being supported when information is provided to informal carers during inpatient stroke rehabilitation? A qualitative study
  33. Improving Access to, and Quality of, Stroke Rehabilitation
  34. Interventions for the uptake of evidence-based recommendations in acute stroke settings
  35. Prospective application of theoretical implementation frameworks to improve health care in hospitals — a systematic review
  36. The Diet Quality of Australian Stroke Survivors in a Community Setting
  37. Impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
  38. The International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance
  39. Interventions for improving walking after stroke: an overview of Cochrane Reviews
  40. ‘The way that we are collecting and using data has evolved’ evaluating the Australian National Stroke Audit programme to inform strategic direction
  41. A ‘plethora of services’ but a lack of consistency: A qualitative study of service providers' perspectives about transitioning from hospital to home for older South Australians
  42. Establishing and evaluating a quality improvement collaborative to address hospital to home transitions for older people
  43. Fit for purpose. Co-production of complex behavioural interventions. A practical guide and exemplar of co-producing a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for people with stroke
  44. Introducing the Needs in Recovery Assessment (NiRA) into clinical practice: protocol for a pilot study investigating the formal and systematic assessment of clinical and social needs experienced by service users at a tertiary, metropolitan mental healt...
  45. Predictors of short‐term hospitalization and emergency department presentations in aged care
  46. Prioritizing guideline recommendations for implementation: a systematic, consumer-inclusive process with a case study using the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management
  47. An integrated knowledge translation approach to address avoidable rehospitalisations and unplanned admissions for older people in South Australia: implementation and evaluation program plan
  48. Do clinical guidelines guide clinical practice in stroke rehabilitation? An international survey of health professionals
  49. Look Before You Leap: Interventions Supervised via Telehealth Involving Activities in Weight-Bearing or Standing Positions for People After Stroke—A Scoping Review
  50. Secondary Prevention of Stroke: Study Protocol for a Telehealth-Delivered Physical Activity and Diet Pilot Randomized Trial (ENAbLE-Pilot)
  51. Out of sight, out of mind: long-term outcomes for people discharged home, to inpatient rehabilitation and to residential aged care after stroke
  52. Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation
  53. Effect of Additional Rehabilitation After Botulinum Toxin-A on Upper Limb Activity in Chronic Stroke
  54. Patient and service factors associated with referral and admission to inpatient rehabilitation after the acute phase of stroke in Australia and Norway
  55. Abstracts Presented at the SMART STROKES 2019 Conference, 8–9 August 2019, Hunter Valley, NSW
  56. Perceived barriers and enablers for implementing water protocols in acute stroke care: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework
  57. Implementation in rehabilitation: a roadmap for practitioners and researchers
  58. Supervised exercise delivered via telehealth in real time to manage chronic conditions in adults: a protocol for a scoping review to inform future research in stroke survivors
  59. Activity Monitors for Increasing Physical Activity in Adult Stroke Survivors
  60. Access to rehabilitation for patients with stroke in Australia
  61. Designing and implementing two facilitation interventions within the ‘Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE)’ study: a qualitative analysis from an external facilitators’ perspective
  62. “There is nothing so practical as a good theory”: a pragmatic guide for selecting theoretical approaches for implementation projects
  63. A mixed-methods study to explore opinions of research translation held by researchers working in a Centre of Research Excellence in Australia
  64. Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
  65. Stroke 2018 Conference, 7–10 August 2018, Sydney, Australia: Abstracts
  66. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors
  67. Lack of research about how to implement evidence-based stroke rehabilitation
  68. Improving the Development, Monitoring and Reporting of Stroke Rehabilitation Research: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable
  69. Circuit Class Therapy for Improving Mobility After Stroke
  70. Inequities in access to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: an international scoping review
  71. Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable
  72. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke
  73. Carers' experiences, needs and preferences during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies
  74. Enabling Continuous Quality Improvement in Practice: The Role and Contribution of Facilitation
  75. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors
  76. Interventions for the uptake of evidence-based recommendations in acute stroke settings
  77. Early Mobilization after Stroke: Changes in Clinical Opinion Despite an Unchanging Evidence Base
  78. Understanding patients' rehabilitation requirements after stroke—are we there yet?
  79. Advancing Evidence-Based Practice in Physical Therapy Settings: Multinational Perspectives on Implementation Strategies and Interventions
  80. Why aren't all patients with stroke assessed for rehabilitation?
  81. Education-only versus a multifaceted intervention for improving assessment of rehabilitation needs after stroke; a cluster randomised trial
  82. Inequities in access to rehabilitation: exploring how acute stroke unit clinicians decide who to refer to rehabilitation
  83. Stroke Survivors' Experiences of Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
  84. Carers’ experiences, needs and preferences during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies
  85. Rehabilitation Assessments for Patients With Stroke in Australian Hospitals Do Not Always Reflect the Patients' Rehabilitation Requirements
  86. Reply from Lynch et al . to letter from Vedpathak and Shah regarding ‘when should physical rehabilitation commence after stroke: A systematic review’
  87. When should physical rehabilitation commence after stroke: a systematic review
  88. Impacts and perceptions of a computer-based length of stay benchmarking program
  89. Is circuit class physiotherapy possible during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation? A feasibility trial
  90. Patient satisfaction with circuit class therapy and individual physiotherapy
  91. Sensory Retraining of the Lower Limb After Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
  92. Clinical education of physiotherapy students in Australia: Perceptions of current models