All Stories

  1. Reconstructing Risk–Risk Analysis to Support Effective Governance of High-Risk Climate Interventions
  2. Solar geoengineering research faces geopolitical deadlock
  3. Carbon Dioxide Removal: What Is Sustainable and Just?
  4. Profit-seeking solar geoengineering exemplifies broader risks of market-based climate governance
  5. Scientific models versus power politics: How security expertise reframes solar geoengineering
  6. Carbon removal for a just transition
  7. Securing the ‘great white shield’? Climate change, Arctic security and the geopolitics of solar geoengineering
  8. Governance for Earth system tipping points – A research agenda
  9. Developing a minifesta for effective academic-activist collaboration in the context of the climate emergency
  10. The challenges of the increasing institutionalization of climate security
  11. Governance for Earth System Tipping Points – a Research Agenda
  12. “It's Not the Climate, Stupid”: Exploring Nonideal Scenarios for Solar Geoengineering Development
  13. Specialty grand challenge: renaming our section to “Carbon Dioxide Removal”
  14. Governing Emerging Solar Geoengineering: A Role for Risk-Risk Evaluation?
  15. Disentangling the “net” from the “offset”: learning for net-zero climate policy from an analysis of “no-net-loss” in biodiversity
  16. “Our Way of Life is not up for Negotiation!”: Climate Interventions in the Shadow of ‘Societal Security’
  17. Toward Dangerous US Unilateralism on Solar Geoengineering
  18. Life in the hole: practices and emotions in the cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence
  19. Which Net Zero? Climate Justice and Net Zero Emissions
  20. Taking deliberative research online: Lessons from four case studies
  21. Attractions of delay: Using deliberative engagement to investigate the political and strategic impacts of greenhouse gas removal technologies
  22. The Political Economy of Circular Economies: Lessons from Future Repair Scenario Deliberations in Sweden
  23. The Dangers of Mainstreaming Solar Geoengineering: A critique of the National Academies Report
  24. It Would Be Irresponsible, Unethical, and Unlawful to Rely on NETs at Large Scale Instead of Mitigation
  25. The risks of solar geoengineering research
  26. Navigating Potential Hype and Opportunity in Governing Marine Carbon Removal
  27. The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering
  28. Repair for a Broken Economy: Lessons for Circular Economy from an International Interview Study of Repairers
  29. Why states disagree about geoengineering
  30. Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature
  31. Local conflicts and national consensus: The strange case of circular economy in Sweden
  32. Social Science Sequestered
  33. Quantifying the potential scale of mitigation deterrence from greenhouse gas removal techniques
  34. The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets
  35. Beyond “Net-Zero”: A Case for Separate Targets for Emissions Reduction and Negative Emissions
  36. Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling
  37. In a broken world: Towards an ethics of repair in the Anthropocene
  38. Towards a cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence by negative emissions technologies (NETs)
  39. Sharing Cities
  40. Mitigation deterrence and the “moral hazard” of solar radiation management
  41. Public conceptions of justice in climate engineering: Evidence from secondary analysis of public deliberation
  42. Sharing Cities
  43. Urban Retrofitting for Sustainability
  44. Tomorrow's World
  45. A comparative global assessment of potential negative emissions technologies
  46. Procedural Justice in Carbon Capture and Storage
  47. Just Sustainabilities
  48. Third Party Rights of Appeal: Enhancing Democracy or Hindering Progress?
  49. Global Stakeholders: corporate accountability and investor engagement
  50. The Crisis of London
  51. Multinational Companies and Environmental Issues
  52. From Seattle to Johannesburg: 'Anti-globalisation' or 'inter-localism'?
  53. Overcoming the barriers to effective national sustainable development strategies: The role of environmental space analysis
  54. ACHIEVING SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF ‘ENVIRONMENTAL SPACE’: A TRANS-EUROPEAN PROJECT
  55. ACHIEVING SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF ‘ENVIRONMENTAL SPACE’: A TRANS‐EUROPEAN PROJECT
  56. Enduring decisions: Evaluating environmental impacts for sustainability planning
  57. Friends of the Earth
  58. “Action for cities” and the urban environment
  59. LONDON AS ECOSYSTEM