Contact

All Stories

  1. Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

    Article • Forensic Science International Synergy, January 2021, Elsevier

    Brent Ostrum

  2. The Logical Approach to Evidence Evaluation

    Article • December 2020, Taylor & Francis

    Brent Ostrum

  3. Sequence determination between blue ballpoint pens and toner using MikrosilTM casting of the intersection

    Article • Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, October 2019, Taylor & Francis

    Brent Ostrum

  4. La position de la Section des documents de la SCSJ sur l'approche logique de l'évaluation de la preuve et le libellé des conclusions

    Article • Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, July 2019, Taylor & Francis

    Brent Ostrum

  5. CSFS Document Section Position on the Logical Approach to Evidence Evaluation and Corresponding Wording of Conclusions

    Article • Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, July 2019, Taylor & Francis

    Brent Ostrum

  6. Conclusions, reporting, and testimony

    Article • January 2019, Elsevier

    Brent Ostrum

  7. A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the “match”/“non-match” stage

    Article • Forensic Science International, March 2017, Elsevier

    Brent Ostrum

  8. A Canadian perspective on forensic science versus pseudoscience

    Article • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, May 2013, Acoustical Society of America (ASA)

    Brent Ostrum

  9. A Canadian perspective on forensic science versus pseudoscience

    Article • January 2013, Acoustical Society of America (ASA)

    Brent Ostrum

  10. Commentary on: Authors’ Response [J Forensic Sci 2009;54(2):501] to Wells’ comments [J Forensic Sci 2009;54(2):500] regarding Krane DE, Ford S, Gilder JR, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, Kornfield IL, Risinger DM, Rudin N, Taylor MS, Thompson WC. Sequent...

    Article • Journal of Forensic Sciences, November 2009, Wiley

    Brent Ostrum