All Stories

  1. Evolution in Response to an Abiotic Stress Shapes Species Coexistence
  2. Inducible tomato defences persist in detached leaves, despite differential plant variety and gene-dependent expression
  3. Competition for food affects the strength of reproductive interference and its consequences for species coexistence
  4. Evolution in response to an abiotic stress shapes species coexistence
  5. Experimental Evolution in a Warming World: The Omics Era
  6. Spider mites collectively avoid plants with cadmium irrespective of their frequency or the presence of competitors
  7. Limits to the adaptation of herbivorous spider mites to metal accumulation in homogeneous and heterogeneous environments
  8. Sex in the kitchen: non-additive effects of competition for food and reproductive interference on coexistence outcomes between closely related species.
  9. How chromosomal inversions reorient the evolutionary process
  10. Spider mites collectively avoid plants with cadmium irrespective of their frequency or the presence of competitors
  11. Evolution in abiotic environments shapes coexistence between two spider mite species
  12. Shaken, not shifted: Genotypic variation tunes how interspecific competition shapes niches
  13. Limits to the adaptation of herbivorous spider mites to metal accumulation in homogeneous and heterogeneous environments
  14. Limited host availability disrupts the genetic correlation between virulence and transmission
  15. Specific sequence of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche pre‐emption by the weak competitor
  16. Order of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche preemption by the weak competitor
  17. Phenotypic evolution during range expansions is contingent on connectivity and density dependence
  18. Virulence constrains transmission even in the absence of a genetic trade-off
  19. Order of arrival promotes coexistence via spatial niche preemption by the weak competitor
  20. Unboxing mutations: Connecting mutation types with evolutionary consequences
  21. Editorial: Coping With Climate Change: A Genomic Perspective on Thermal Adaptation
  22. The Adaptive Potential of the Middle Domain of Yeast Hsp90
  23. Creating outbred and inbred populations in haplodiploids to measure adaptive responses in the laboratory
  24. Selection on a single trait does not recapitulate the evolution of life-history traits seen during an invasion
  25. Comprehensive fitness maps of Hsp90 show widespread environmental dependence
  26. The adaptive potential of the M-domain of yeast Hsp90
  27. How phenotypic convergence arises in experimental evolution
  28. Evolution in the light of fitness landscape theory
  29. The fitness landscape of the codon space across environments
  30. The utility of fitness landscapes and big data for predicting evolution
  31. Playing evolution in the laboratory: From the first major evolutionary transition to global warming
  32. Let’s move beyond costs of resistance!
  33. The fitness landscape of the codon space across environments
  34. Different Genomic Changes Underlie Adaptive Evolution in Populations of Contrasting History
  35. What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger: can Fisher’s Geometric model predict antibiotic resistance evolution?
  36. Predictable phenotypic, but not karyotypic, evolution of populations with contrasting initial history
  37. Tracking changes in chromosomal arrangements and their genetic content during adaptation
  38. Keeping your options open: Maintenance of thermal plasticity during adaptation to a stable environment
  39. Wing trait-inversion associations inDrosophila subobscuracan be generalized within continents, but may change through time
  40. Evolution of mating behavior between two populations adapting to common environmental conditions
  41. History, chance and selection during phenotypic and genomic experimental evolution: replaying the tape of life at different levels
  42. How much can history constrain adaptive evolution? A real‐time evolutionary approach of inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila subobscura
  43. Laboratory Selection Quickly Erases Historical Differentiation
  44. Fast evolutionary genetic differentiation during experimental colonizations
  45. From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation
  46. Climate change and chromosomal inversions in Drosophila subobscura
  47. Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura
  48. CLINAL PATTERNS OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSION POLYMORPHISMS INDROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURAARE PARTLY ASSOCIATED WITH THERMAL PREFERENCES AND HEAT STRESS RESISTANCE
  49. Contrasting patterns of phenotypic variation linked to chromosomal inversions in native and colonizing populations ofDrosophila subobscura
  50. HOW REPEATABLE IS ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION? THE ROLE OF GEOGRAPHICAL ORIGIN AND FOUNDER EFFECTS IN LABORATORY ADAPTATION